On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
I would be interested in a more contributor oriented insight at this
point. For example it took me a while to realize that being on Github
suddenly means that people edit C code via the web interface without any
means to syntax / compile / run test
On 24.10.2016 19:26, Val Kulkov wrote:
> Hi Jo,
>
Part of the problem, I
think, is the lack of clear and consistent (and visible) governance and
communication makes the project unappealing for companies to be
interested in paying developers to work on either. It's not
Hi Daniel,
> Several months after the split it looks like things have pretty much
> ended up where they were before the split. It's starting to look
> like the talk of encouraging new blood, and being more open and
> transparent was more talk than real intention.
I am sorry to hear that this
On 10/24/2016 12:58 AM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Several months after the split it looks like things have pretty much
> ended up where they were before the split. It's starting to look like
> the talk of encouraging new blood, and being more open and transparent
> was more talk than
