> On 6 Jan 2017, at 1:37 PM, David Lang wrote:
>
> LEDE is already accepting pull requests via github
Oh I didn't realize that. Now I even see it on the lede webpage. I might have
missed that before :-/ Thanks for the heads-up!
/daniel
___
On Fri, 6 Jan 2017, Daniel (bovi) Bovensiepen wrote:
As part of this those I'm thinking that having a more
'commercial-quality' flavour and a more 'community' flavour branches
would be useful.
Could I make one remark concerning this: I fully understand from a review and
quality point of view
> As part of this those I'm thinking that having a more
> 'commercial-quality' flavour and a more 'community' flavour branches
> would be useful.
Could I make one remark concerning this: I fully understand from a review and
quality point of view the current way of providing patches to LEDE or Op
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:06:22 -0500
"Hauke Mehrtens" wrote:
> We had multiple meetings to find a solution to solve the problems
> between the OpenWrt and the LEDE project and to discuss a possible
> merge. Everyone with commit access to LEDE and all OpenWrt core
> developers were invited to these
> Yocto. If lede were to succeed in meeting its other goals, coherently,
> preserving "lede" and moving forward as a separate project does make
> sense.
I don't have a clear opinion either way, but I think there are several
points to take into account:
- OpenWRT indeed has a fair bit of positive n
We had multiple meetings to find a solution to solve the problems
between the OpenWrt and the LEDE project and to discuss a possible
merge. Everyone with commit access to LEDE and all OpenWrt core
developers were invited to these meetings. We had productive and
friendly discussions about the proble
