On 8 December 2016 at 02:00, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 12/07/2016 11:52 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 12/07/2016 08:36 PM, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
I'm aware some packages (e.g. upstream-ssl,
On 12/07/2016 11:52 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 12/07/2016 08:36 PM, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> I'm aware some packages (e.g. upstream-ssl, hostapd, dnsmasq) use
>>> VARIANT.
>>>
>>> I don't really understand the gain of
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 12/07/2016 08:36 PM, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> I'm aware some packages (e.g. upstream-ssl, hostapd, dnsmasq) use
>>> VARIANT.
>>>
>>> I don't
On 12/07/2016 08:36 PM, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
I'm aware some packages (e.g. upstream-ssl, hostapd, dnsmasq) use VARIANT.
I don't really understand the gain of this. How does it differ from
specifying separated packages?
Hello Rafał,
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> I'm aware some packages (e.g. upstream-ssl, hostapd, dnsmasq) use VARIANT.
>
> I don't really understand the gain of this. How does it differ from
> specifying separated packages?
> I'm looking at
I'm aware some packages (e.g. upstream-ssl, hostapd, dnsmasq) use VARIANT.
I don't really understand the gain of this. How does it differ from
specifying separated packages?
I'm looking at package/libs/ustream-ssl/Makefile and I don't see much
code saving from using this VARIANT variable/feature.