[LEDE-DEV] odhcpd [PATCHv2 3/3] Respect interface "ignore" settings as documented.

From: Karl Palsson The "ignore" option is correctly loaded. Actually observe it as documented. Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson --- Changes since v1: * nothing, no feedback received on this item src/config.c | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+),

[LEDE-DEV] odhcpd [PATCHv2 2/3] remove superfluous log output.

From: Karl Palsson Drop pointless syslog. The single line just doubles the amount of lines logged to syslog without adding any value. Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson --- Change since v1: Nothing src/odhcpd.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff

[LEDE-DEV] odhcpd: [PATCHv2 1/3] enable loglevel setting via command line

From: Karl Palsson Currently the loglevel is hardcoded to LOG_WARNING, even though there is debug log messages. Allow setting the loglevel via cli option. Include basic help text because we're adding command line options. Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson ---

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] cmake: Really look for uci.h

Commit 46063a1657c4 ("cmake: Find uci.h") introduced a check against libubus.h but mountd actually uses uci.h, so fix that. Fixes: 46063a1657c4 ("cmake: Find uci.h") Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli --- CMakeLists.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

Re: [LEDE-DEV] The procd daemon does not handle correctly the instances

procd uses a vlist to store instances in. if oe changes all are restarted. we need to change this as per my last mail to only restart those that actually changed. John On 28/09/2016 15:44, Lebleu Pierre wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for your answer. > > First, I am going to clarify a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] The procd daemon does not handle correctly the instances

this might actually be solvable int he scripts, will need to take a closer look today John On 29/09/2016 07:20, John Crispin wrote: > procd uses a vlist to store instances in. if oe changes all are > restarted. we need to change this as per my last mail to only restart > those that

[LEDE-DEV] Patches to web

I'd like to make a small pull-request to the `web` repo. But I don't quite understand the instructions online. >From what I can tell, I should send something with a subject like 'web: Instructions for architecture discovery' and a body generated by something like

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt userspace git repo location

On 28 September 2016 at 10:30, Felix Fietkau wrote: > [Cc'd lede-dev@] > > On 2016-09-28 10:03, Luka Perkov wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 08:46:51AM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: >>> On 2016-09-28 00:56, Luka Perkov wrote: >>> > Hi Felix, >>> > >>> > it seems there is some

Re: [LEDE-DEV] The procd daemon does not handle correctly the instances

Hi, Thank you for your answer. First, I am going to clarify a little bit what I am trying to do. I would like to have more than one instance for a given daemon (here, dnsmasq). I would like to stop one instance when I need. I would like to start one instance without stopping the other one.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt userspace git repo location

Hello Valent, Am Wed, 28 Sep 2016 13:25:20 +0200 schrieb "valent.turko...@gmail.com" : > Github has become de facto standard for contributing to open source > projects, so no matter if you hate it or love it, this is just now the > new norm. > Going against the "norm"

Re: [LEDE-DEV] merging the layerscape target

Hi John, I have submit a new pull request and post a simple test log, please check: https://github.com/lede-project/source/pull/344 V6 patch update summary: 1.Dropping unnecessary USB_EHCI_FSL related patches. 2.Change BOARDNAME from "layerscape" to "NXP Layerscape" Thanks & Best Regards

Re: [LEDE-DEV] o2 box 6431 / VGV7510KW22 - SIP with FXS/TAE Ports | owsip or alternative ?

Hello Daniel, if you want i can send you a Device - or how can i help/support you to get the FXS Ports working ? Thanks Dennis       Gesendet: Freitag, 23. September 2016 um 22:24 Uhr Von: "Daniel Golle" An: "Dennis Schneck" Cc: