Hi,
On 02/07/2016 17:00, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin
> ---
> target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
> b/target/linux/lanti
Hi,
few comments
1) the patch needs to be split into 2, ext2 change/lzo change
2) send them inline please and not as attachement
3) the V3 needs to be in the subject prefix [PATCH V3] procd: ...
4) the Signed-off-by: line is missing
John
On 03/07/2016 08:14, Luke McKee wrote:
> To quote
On Sun, 3 Jul 2016, Dennis Schneck wrote:
Hello,
i use a TP Link Archer C7 v2 with LEDE r811.
But the Wireless performace (2,4GHz) is not optimal.
Are the parameter or something else to tune the performace ?
If use other Firmware in the same Environment get better transfer rates.
CPU use is ne
Hello,
i use a TP Link Archer C7 v2 with LEDE r811.
But the Wireless performace (2,4GHz) is not optimal.
Are the parameter or something else to tune the performace ?
If use other Firmware in the same Environment get better transfer rates.
CPU use is near 10% at the speed test.
Free memory near
Actually lzo compresses better but they are both fast. lz4 is faster
on embedded devices.
zram-swap should use lz4 if available and the patch can be as it
was.http://blog.jpountz.net/post/28092106032/wow-lz4-is-fast
lz4 has compression levels. in any case, speed > size on
embedded devices. inter
v2 of the patch. uses lz4 compression by default. lz4 is always
installed by openwrt Makefile Config.in if zram.
lz4 is best for compressed filesystems as we all know (if you had to
choose between that and lzo).
zram-swap can keep using lzo for speed!
I'll work in a compatibility patch for zram-s
Citeren Luke McKee :
Hi guys,
This is a little one. Busybox mkfs.ext2 works and with this setup the
ext4 module can mount /tmp without a journal. See #22666 I tested it.
Also the Makefile for procd doesn't have any dependencies for busybox
CONFIG_BUSYBOX_CONFIG_MKFS_EXT2=y OR e2fsprogs.
See t
Hi guys,
This is a little one. Busybox mkfs.ext2 works and with this setup the
ext4 module can mount /tmp without a journal. See #22666 I tested it.
Also the Makefile for procd doesn't have any dependencies for busybox
CONFIG_BUSYBOX_CONFIG_MKFS_EXT2=y OR e2fsprogs.
See the zram-swap Makefile. M
On 02/07/16 16:00, Mathias Kresin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin
---
package/base-files/files/bin/config_generate | 5 +++--
package/base-files/files/lib/functions/uci-defaults.sh | 2 ++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/base-files/file
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 06:15:53PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 07/02/2016 05:38 PM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> > The resulting packages for kmod-udptunnel{4,6} are only 800 octets and do
> > not contain any .ko module:
>
> Thank you for the report, this looks like a problem in lede in
> combi
On 07/02/2016 05:38 PM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:55:28PM +0200, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
>> I think I found the cause of the issue: the packages kmod-udptunnel4.ipk
>> and kmod-udptunnel6.ipk are generated, but are empty (no .ko file). When
>> I activate the kernel symbo
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:55:28PM +0200, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> I think I found the cause of the issue: the packages kmod-udptunnel4.ipk
> and kmod-udptunnel6.ipk are generated, but are empty (no .ko file). When
> I activate the kernel symbol in kernel_menuconfig, these packages do
> provide t
Extract the base MAC address from the u-boot environment instead of
relying on a properly passed ethaddr kernel command-line parameter.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin
---
target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/linux/lanti
If an ESI is set, it will be used as MAC address for the nas0
interface.
According to the ESI man page, changes to the ESI are not automatically
propagated throughout the system and therefore esi should be used
early during system.
Setting the ESI before creating the nas interface should be early
Now that the ESI is set by br2684ctl we can remove the ESI related stuff
from the ltq-xdsl-apps.
This eliminates a potential MAC address collision, since the esi command
sets always the eth0 mac incremented by one, regardless whether this MAC
address is used by another interface.
Signed-off-by: M
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin
---
package/base-files/files/bin/config_generate | 5 +++--
package/base-files/files/lib/functions/uci-defaults.sh | 2 ++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/base-files/files/bin/config_generate
b/package/base-files/file
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin
---
target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
b/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
index c271e62..3bb4e6e 100
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 03:48:36PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> > However, I have some trouble understanding what KCONFIG does. Wireguard
> > needs a few kernel options, so I thought that KCONFIG was the place to
> > declare such dependencies:
> >
> >
> > https://github.com/zorun/packages-1/
On 07/02/2016 03:20 PM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am packaging a new kernel module (wireguard), the package is currently here
> [1].
>
> However, I have some trouble understanding what KCONFIG does. Wireguard
> needs a few kernel options, so I thought that KCONFIG was the place to
> d
On 02/07/2016 15:20, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am packaging a new kernel module (wireguard), the package is currently here
> [1].
>
> However, I have some trouble understanding what KCONFIG does. Wireguard
> needs a few kernel options, so I thought that KCONFIG was the place to
> de
On 02/07/2016 15:20, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am packaging a new kernel module (wireguard), the package is currently here
> [1].
>
> However, I have some trouble understanding what KCONFIG does. Wireguard
> needs a few kernel options, so I thought that KCONFIG was the place to
> de
Hi,
I am packaging a new kernel module (wireguard), the package is currently here
[1].
However, I have some trouble understanding what KCONFIG does. Wireguard
needs a few kernel options, so I thought that KCONFIG was the place to
declare such dependencies:
https://github.com/zorun/packages-1
On 2016-07-01 11:50, Eduardo Abinader wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> 1) Just set a non-allowed DFS channel for DE, for instance.
> 2) Enable wireless; it fails
> 3) Change to a valid channel; the wdev is not set up.
>
> There is also a leftover on /etc/init.d/network reload.
> I think it should call /
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
docs/rpcd.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/docs/rpcd.txt b/docs/rpcd.txt
index 211..3756ee3 100644
--- a/docs/rpcd.txt
+++ b/docs/rpcd.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
---
---
RPC daemon
-
+==
==
24 matches
Mail list logo
