Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 05/15/2017 10:16 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> On May 12, 2017, at 6:02 AM, Edwin van Drunen wrote: >> >> I understand that the vote is done amongst the developers, the people >> actually running the project, this makes sense. >> But if the goal of the project is not

Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

> On May 12, 2017, at 6:02 AM, Edwin van Drunen wrote: > > I understand that the vote is done amongst the developers, the people > actually running the project, this makes sense. > But if the goal of the project is not only to keep yourself busy, but also to > target a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

On 05/15/2017 09:11 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> On May 11, 2017, at 10:09 PM, Eric Luehrsen wrote: >> >> People don't like rules and that could be even more true with open >> source work groups. However, a good set of _limited_ rules can make life >> easier. You may

Re: [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal

> On May 11, 2017, at 10:09 PM, Eric Luehrsen wrote: > > People don't like rules and that could be even more true with open > source work groups. However, a good set of _limited_ rules can make life > easier. You may focus on important work or joyful recreation while

Re: [LEDE-DEV] convention on uid/gid for packages

On 15.05.2017 18:02, Val Kulkov wrote: > On 15 May 2017 at 11:46, Yousong Zhou wrote: >> On 15 May 2017 at 23:29, Val Kulkov wrote: >>> Yousong, perhaps I was not clear. What I am suggesting is to change >>> the auto-allocation to start from 1000

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: update 17.01 kernel 4.4 to 4.4.68

Bump the 17.01 tree kernel to 4.4.68. Trunk 4.4 and 17.01 4.4 have diverged, talked this through with jow, he was okay with a clean diff against 17.01 and not a backported trunk patch. The following patches were applied upstream: 062-[1-6]-MIPS-* series

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] igmpproxy: Set logopts to "-d" to prevent spamming the system log

This option redirects the igmpproxy to STDERR instead of system log. Without this option the system log is unusable because igmpproxy warns about every SSDP package recieved from wan. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Tunin ---

Re: [LEDE-DEV] convention on uid/gid for packages

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:59:55PM +0800, Yousong Zhou wrote: > On 15 May 2017 at 22:41, Val Kulkov wrote: > > The auto-allocation of uid/gid emulates useradd/groupadd, picking the > > first unused uid/gid starting from 100. This works quite well on its > > own, but there

Re: [LEDE-DEV] convention on uid/gid for packages

On 05/15/2017 07:29 PM, Tobias Welz wrote: > > If not, there would be the need to do some post-processing after > restore to somehow fix gids/uids to make everything work again; but it > will be an extra level of complexity. uhm, I might say something very noobish, but... are all packages

Re: [LEDE-DEV] convention on uid/gid for packages

On 15 May 2017 at 11:46, Yousong Zhou wrote: > On 15 May 2017 at 23:29, Val Kulkov wrote: >> Yousong, perhaps I was not clear. What I am suggesting is to change >> the auto-allocation to start from 1000 rather than from 100 (1000 is >> just a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] convention on uid/gid for packages

On 15 May 2017 at 23:29, Val Kulkov wrote: > Yousong, perhaps I was not clear. What I am suggesting is to change > the auto-allocation to start from 1000 rather than from 100 (1000 is > just a suggestion, it could be anything else that is high enough), and > to have a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] convention on uid/gid for packages

On 15 May 2017 at 11:12, Yousong Zhou wrote: > On 15 May 2017 at 23:04, Val Kulkov wrote: >> On 15 May 2017 at 10:59, Yousong Zhou wrote: >>> On 15 May 2017 at 22:41, Val Kulkov wrote: The

Re: [LEDE-DEV] convention on uid/gid for packages

On 15 May 2017 at 23:04, Val Kulkov wrote: > On 15 May 2017 at 10:59, Yousong Zhou wrote: >> On 15 May 2017 at 22:41, Val Kulkov wrote: >>> The auto-allocation of uid/gid emulates useradd/groupadd, picking the >>> first unused

Re: [LEDE-DEV] convention on uid/gid for packages

On 15 May 2017 at 10:59, Yousong Zhou wrote: > On 15 May 2017 at 22:41, Val Kulkov wrote: >> The auto-allocation of uid/gid emulates useradd/groupadd, picking the >> first unused uid/gid starting from 100. This works quite well on its >> own, but

Re: [LEDE-DEV] convention on uid/gid for packages

On 15 May 2017 at 22:41, Val Kulkov wrote: > The auto-allocation of uid/gid emulates useradd/groupadd, picking the > first unused uid/gid starting from 100. This works quite well on its > own, but there are about three dozen packages in the packages repo > that come with

Re: [LEDE-DEV] convention on uid/gid for packages

On 15 May 2017 at 09:46, Yousong Zhou wrote: > On 15 May 2017 at 21:07, Val Kulkov wrote: >> On 15 May 2017 at 02:30, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: >>> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Daniel Golle wrote:

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: bump to 4.4.68

Refresh patches. A number of patches have landed upstream & hence are no longer required locally: 062-[1-6]-MIPS-* series 042-0004-mtd-bcm47xxpart-fix-parsing-first-block Reintroduced lantiq/patches-4.4/0050-MIPS-Lantiq-Fix-cascaded-IRQ-setup as it was incorrectly included upstream thus dropped

Re: [LEDE-DEV] convention on uid/gid for packages

On 15 May 2017 at 21:07, Val Kulkov wrote: > On 15 May 2017 at 02:30, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: >> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Daniel Golle wrote: >>> Hi Val, >>> >>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 06:23:29PM -0400, Val Kulkov

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ipq806x: Add nand boot support for ipq40xx AP-DK04.1-C1

Thanks Chris Blake, >First off, thank you very much for this patch and your work on the ipq40xx >platform. I have been doing more testing, and it seems that some of the pins >in pinctl are not defined to the correct function. >This is what I am currently seeing on the board: > [1.278649]

Re: [LEDE-DEV] convention on uid/gid for packages

On 15 May 2017 at 02:30, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Daniel Golle wrote: >> Hi Val, >> >> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 06:23:29PM -0400, Val Kulkov wrote: >>> Is there any convention on the use of uid and gid when

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] kernel: update kernel 4.9 to 4.9.28

- Refresh all patches - Removed upstreamed - Adapted 1 Compile tested on: bcm53xx, cns3xxx, imx6 Run tested on: cns3xxx & imx6 Signed-off-by: Koen Vandeputte --- 3rd & final attempt to bump the kernel. I would be very grateful if more people could test it on

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] dnsmasq: also write /tmp/resolv.conf when UCI dhcp.dnsmasq.noresolv is '1'

* Bastian Bittorf [15.05.2017 09:27]: > > + [ "$noreolv" -eq '1' -o "$resolvfile" = "/tmp/resolv.conf.auto" ] && { > > thanks for the patch! > > please test for 'bool_true' not for 1 sorry for the noise, this is already normalized by config_get_bool() - so testing for 0 or 1 is

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] dnsmasq: also write /tmp/resolv.conf when UCI dhcp.dnsmasq.noresolv is '1'

* Paul Oranje [15.05.2017 09:08]: > fixes FS#785 > v1: write /tmp/resolv.conf also when nosolv is true > v2: also change guard in dnsmasq_stop() routine > > Signed-off-by: Paul Oranje > --- > package/network/services/dnsmasq/files/dnsmasq.init | 4 ++-- > 1 file

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ipq806x: Add nand boot support for ipq40xx AP-DK04.1-C1

>Hello Ram, On Thursday, May 11, 2017 8:39:46 PM CEST Christian Lamparter wrote: > On Thursday, May 11, 2017 10:15:58 PM CEST Ram Chandra Jangir wrote: > > I added nand pinmux in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/761243/ , > > Could you please try with this, if it helps you. > Thanks, I'll

Re: [LEDE-DEV] convention on uid/gid for packages

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Daniel Golle wrote: > Hi Val, > > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 06:23:29PM -0400, Val Kulkov wrote: >> Is there any convention on the use of uid and gid when creating new >> users or groups? Can someone point me to it, if it exists? >> >> I