Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] Fix missing libc.

On 11.05.2018 00:55, Lev wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2018 23:49:36 +0200 Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2018-05-10 23:23, Lev wrote: From: Lev Please explain what you're trying to do here. The patch makes no sense to me. glibc v2.26 was not found any of

Re: [LEDE-DEV] new ath79 target

On 08.05.2018 10:48, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 08.05.2018 03:01, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 07.05.2018 09:13, John Crispin wrote: Hi, I have just pushed the new ath79 target to trunk. This will replace ar71xx mid term, switching the target over to pure OF. a few boards are already supported

Re: [LEDE-DEV] new ath79 target

On 08.05.2018 03:01, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 07.05.2018 09:13, John Crispin wrote: Hi, I have just pushed the new ath79 target to trunk. This will replace ar71xx mid term, switching the target over to pure OF. a few boards are already supported, would be great if people could start moving

Re: [LEDE-DEV] new ath79 target

On 07.05.2018 09:13, John Crispin wrote: Hi, I have just pushed the new ath79 target to trunk. This will replace ar71xx mid term, switching the target over to pure OF. a few boards are already supported, would be great if people could start moving boards over that they use. I am available to

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Firewall restart crashes routers with kernel 4.14

On 05.05.2018 15:56, Kristian Evensen wrote: Hello, When restarting the firewall on routers running latest nightly, I frequently get the following warning: [ 74.952854] [ cut here ] [ 74.952874] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_rtcache.c:197

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 3/5] tools/mtd-utils: update to version 2.0.1

On 16.04.2018 01:53, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This version now uses autotools to configure the build system. They are also using the newly added zlib package. Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens --- tools/Makefile | 2 +-

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/5] tools/zlib: move zlib build to tools

On 18.04.2018 01:24, Koen Vandeputte wrote: On 17-04-18 19:16, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 16.04.2018 01:53, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This allows us to link the other tools against our libz and we do not need the system zlib any more. [...] +endef + +$(eval $(call HostBuild)) I tested

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/5] tools/zlib: move zlib build to tools

On 16.04.2018 01:53, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This allows us to link the other tools against our libz and we do not need the system zlib any more. Only the static linked library is copied to the staging directory so we have a statically linked library on all systems and not only on Linux. This

Re: [LEDE-DEV] 18.03/4 -> GCC 5 or 7

On 04.03.2018 17:15, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 02/16/2018 01:46 PM, John Crispin wrote: Hi, whats on the critical todo list for the upcoming release ? i still have a few minor things that I'll be adding shortly, apart from that I am currently not aware of any huge problems. the release will be

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2 0/5] mvebu: add kernel 4.14 support

On 09.02.2018 23:48, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 02/09/2018 12:27 AM, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 21.01.2018 19:53, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This add support for kernel 4.14 to the mvebu target. My main reason to add kernel 4.14 support is to make it easier to also add support for the Marvell Armada

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2 0/5] mvebu: add kernel 4.14 support

supported boards so I can not runtime test this myself, Lucian Cristian already tested an older version of these patches on one of his boards. My current working tree for this target can be found here: https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/hauke.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/mvebu-4.14 This tree also

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ag71xx: Reorder ring structs for lower cache trashing.

On 30.01.2018 18:14, Rosen Penev wrote: Based on Qualcomm's upstream code. Reordered a bit different. iperf3 speed goes from ~279mbps to ~320mbps. Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev --- .../files/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/ag71xx/ag71xx.h | 13 - 1 file

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/25] Add support for kernel 4.14

On 11.12.2017 00:12, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This adds support for kernel 4.14 to LEDE. This ports the generic patches to kernel 4.14 and also adds support for kernel 4.14 to the x86 target, I am also working on adding support for the lantiq target, but there are still some problems with the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] STP, rSTP and MSTP

On 28.11.2017 13:39, Stefan Peter wrote: Hi Pablo On 28.11.2017 11:05, Pablo I. Pousada Rial wrote: Does LEDE implement just basic STP, or does it provide access to RSTP or MSTP? The Linux kernel only implements basic STP. I successfully have used mstpd from https://github.com/mstpd/mstpd for

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC 00/26] Add support for kernel 4.14

On 26.11.2017 13:44, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This adds support for kernel 4.14 to LEDE. This ports the generic patches to kernel 4.14 and also adds support for kernel 4.14 to the x86 target, I am also working on adding support for the lantiq target, but there are still some problems with the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] samba36: Disable by default

On 22.11.2017 16:20, Paul Oranje wrote: On an archer-c7-v2 running 17.01.2 and samba with "use sendfile" enabled, no problems have been noticed (long up-time). S.y. Paul Op 21 nov. 2017, om 10:34 heeft Karl Palsson het volgende geschreven: Rosen Penev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] musl: update to 1.1.17

On 01.11.2017 12:08, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 29.10.2017 01:08, Christian Lamparter wrote: On Sunday, October 22, 2017 12:02:07 AM CEST Hannu Nyman wrote: Hauke Mehrtens wrote on Sat Oct 21 12:26:04 PDT 2017:   > I think your problem is fixed in ec04d122f1182aeb91f39b0e80ae40c68e4d9

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] musl: update to 1.1.17

On 29.10.2017 01:08, Christian Lamparter wrote: On Sunday, October 22, 2017 12:02:07 AM CEST Hannu Nyman wrote: Hauke Mehrtens wrote on Sat Oct 21 12:26:04 PDT 2017: > I think your problem is fixed in ec04d122f1182aeb91f39b0e80ae40c68e4d9605 > fix regression in glob with literal . or ..

[LEDE-DEV] WRT3200ACM backport wireless unstable

does anybody have unstable system since the update of wireless backport ? mine rebooted 3 times in ~5 days and lost wireless connectivity with the following kernel errors: [262171.109262] ieee80211 phy0: cmd 0x801d=MEMAddrAccess timed out [262171.115219] ieee80211 phy0: return code: 0x001d

Re: [LEDE-DEV] test omap target with kernel 4.9

On 16.10.2017 03:30, Alexander Couzens wrote: Hi Hauke, I've tested your tree. panda-board a3 - works, but no network, but master/4.4 doesn't have network either. panda-board-a4 - u-boot SPL refuse to boot. beaglebone-black - works beagle-board - usb attached network doesn't come up and I

Re: [LEDE-DEV] iptables broken x86 ?

On 10.10.2017 05:26, Florian Fainelli wrote: Le 10/09/17 à 11:01, Lucian Cristian a écrit : I'm trying to make a custom image and can't seem to get pass by this You would have to provide a more complete log, here we just see the make returning an error back from the directories it descended

Re: [LEDE-DEV] iptables broken x86 ?

On 10.10.2017 05:26, Florian Fainelli wrote: Le 10/09/17 à 11:01, Lucian Cristian a écrit : I'm trying to make a custom image and can't seem to get pass by this You would have to provide a more complete log, here we just see the make returning an error back from the directories it descended

[LEDE-DEV] iptables broken x86 ?

I'm trying to make a custom image and can't seem to get pass by this make[6]: Leaving directory '/home/build/32bit/build_dir/target-i386_pentium4_musl/linux-x86_generic/iptables-1.6.1/extensions' Making all in iptables make[6]: Entering directory

Re: [LEDE-DEV] kernel 4.9 migration for next release

On 02.10.2017 22:18, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: For the next major LEDE release after 17.01 all targets should be on kernel 4.9, otherwise they will most likely not be included in the release. The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine: * apm821xx * arc770 * archs38 * armvirt * ath25 *

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Update to util-linux 2.30.1 breaks x86_64 squashfs-combined

On 29.09.2017 14:07, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2017-09-29 13:04, Daniel Golle wrote: On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:20:08PM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2017-09-11 02:33, Philip Prindeville wrote: Changing the subject from the previous thread as it turned out to not have to do with sysupgrade at

Re: [LEDE-DEV] SUNXI: Network problem with kernel 4.9.51

On 27.09.2017 23:32, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 09/27/2017 10:05 PM, Lucian Cristian wrote: Do you have a crash log? I would like to add this to master soon, because it adds ssupport for the mac found on some recent Allwinner SoCs. Hauke ___ Lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] SUNXI: Network problem with kernel 4.9.51

Do you have a crash log? I would like to add this to master soon, because it adds ssupport for the mac found on some recent Allwinner SoCs. Hauke ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org

Re: [LEDE-DEV] SUNXI: Network problem with kernel 4.9.51

I see that BananaPI has CONFIG_GMAC_TX_DELAY=3 set by default, are you saying that setting it to 1 is working better ? Regards ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] SUNXI: Network problem with kernel 4.9.51

On 26.09.2017 12:25, Gerhard Bertelsmann wrote: Hi Hauke, [snip] root@LEDE:~# ping -qc 100 192.168.0.9 PING 192.168.0.9 (192.168.0.9): 56 data bytes --- 192.168.0.9 ping statistics --- 100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.363/0.514/0.813 ms

Re: [LEDE-DEV] SUNXI: Network problem with kernel 4.9.51

On 23.09.2017 19:03, Gerhard Bertelsmann wrote: Hi Zoltan, Am 2017-09-23 17:36, schrieb Zoltan HERPAI: Hi Gerhard, On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, Gerhard Bertelsmann wrote: Hi, I'm trying Lede HEAD with a BananaPI (SUNXI7 A20) and have an issue with the network connection: root@Modellbahn-BPi:/#

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

Is something that blocks these patch sets to go in trunk ? Regards Lucian ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] RFC [PATCH] odhcpd: don't enable server mode on dhcp lan

On 01.09.2017 00:35, Karl Palsson wrote: Daniel Golle wrote: Hi Karl, On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:17:38PM +, Karl Palsson wrote: Instead of blindly enabling the odhcpd v6 server and RA server on the lan port, only do that if the lan port isn't set to DHCP. This

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On 09.08.2017 22:08, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 08/08/2017 01:13 AM, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 07.08.2017 19:47, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 07.08.2017 19:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: ... Hi Lucian, The eMMC version needs an extra device tree file, could you please use this one: arch/arm/boot/dts

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On 07.08.2017 19:47, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 07.08.2017 19:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: ... Hi Lucian, The eMMC version needs an extra device tree file, could you please use this one: arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-lime2-emmc.dts We should probably add two device one for the normal

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On 07.08.2017 19:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 08/07/2017 06:13 PM, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 07.08.2017 18:55, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 08/06/2017 08:16 PM, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 04.08.2017 00:37, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This upgrades the target to kernel 4.9 and also adds support

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On 07.08.2017 18:55, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 08/06/2017 08:16 PM, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 04.08.2017 00:37, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This upgrades the target to kernel 4.9 and also adds support for the Allwinner A64 SoC. This was only tested on the pine64+ and I do not own any older Allwinner

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 00/13] sunxi: upgrade to kernel 4.9 and add A64 support

On 04.08.2017 00:37, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: This upgrades the target to kernel 4.9 and also adds support for the Allwinner A64 SoC. This was only tested on the pine64+ and I do not own any older Allwinner SoC. Could someone please test this on an older 32 bit Allwinner SoC and report back some

Re: [LEDE-DEV] dnsmasq possible bug on creating config

On 20.06.2017 22:16, Uwe Arnold wrote: Hi guys, I'm using openwrt / lede devices for at least 5 years but never actively submitted any line of code or something. But i think the time has come ;) I hope this is the right channel for this: I added below lines to /etc/dnsmasq.conf: # inspect the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Planning v17.01.2

On 24.05.2017 23:34, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: Hi, I'd like to start preparing the v17.01.2 release during the upcoming weekend with the goal to release final binaries within the next week (~May 29th till June 3rd). Changes that shall be part of 17.01.2 should be merged until Sunday, the 28th.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2 00/19] Universal staged sysupgrade and assorted fixes

On 13.05.2017 22:56, Matthias Schiffer wrote: Text from my RFC mail: --- When talking about https://bugs.lede-project.org/index.php?do=details_id=685 with jow and lynxis, we came to the conclusion that the best way to fix sysupgrades would be to generalize the staged sysupgrade used on NAND

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2 00/19] Universal staged sysupgrade and assorted fixes

On 13.05.2017 22:56, Matthias Schiffer wrote: Text from my RFC mail: --- When talking about https://bugs.lede-project.org/index.php?do=details_id=685 with jow and lynxis, we came to the conclusion that the best way to fix sysupgrades would be to generalize the staged sysupgrade used on NAND

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH ubox 0/6] kmodloader: add module alias support

On 11.01.2017 13:54, Yousong Zhou wrote: Aliases are essential information for working with kernel modules. Netfilter subsystem will request for ipt_hashlimit and ip6t_hashlimit respectively when called with xt_request_find_match(NFPROTO_IPV{4,6}, "hashlimit", 1) The kernel

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Difference between AutoLoad vs. AutoProbe for kernel modules?

On 09.01.2017 15:25, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: Hi, While investigating an issue with module loading order¹, I discovered that some kernel packages use AutoProbe, like this: AUTOLOAD:=$(call AutoProbe,xt_hashlimit) while some kernel packages use the AutoLoad helper I was used to, with a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH RFC 1/2] openvpn: update to 2.4_rc2

On 25.12.2016 16:17, Magnus Kroken wrote: Hi Martin On 25.12.2016 14.23, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: I guess this worked on LEDE with PolarSSL with OpenVPN 2.3: #define POLARSSL_KEY_EXCHANGE_DHE_RSA_ENABLED while //#define MBEDTLS_KEY_EXCHANGE_DHE_RSA_ENABLED can you tell if I ran into some

Re: [LEDE-DEV] RFC: removing support for old Atheros reference boards

On 08.12.2016 22:43, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2016-12-08 21:39, Lucian Cristian wrote: On 08.12.2016 22:27, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2016-12-08 21:26, Felix Fietkau wrote: Hi all, support code for some old ar71xx reference boards (e.g. AP83) carries quite a bit of specific code that bloats

[LEDE-DEV] x86_64 kernel panic

today's snapshot seems to panic early on kernel boot followed by reset regards Lucian ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev