Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?
2017-11-27 9:37 GMT+08:00: > Patch submitted to enable configuring dnsmasq IPset domain rules > through LuCI > > https://github.com/openwrt/luci/pull/1453 About 1.3 billion people need this. > > ___ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?
Woops, that should have been in reply to http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2017-October/009225.html On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:37 AM,wrote: > Patch submitted to enable configuring dnsmasq IPset domain rules > through LuCI > > https://github.com/openwrt/luci/pull/1453 ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?
Patch submitted to enable configuring dnsmasq IPset domain rules through LuCI https://github.com/openwrt/luci/pull/1453 ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?
One usecase not currently supported is managing dnsmasq ipset lists through LuCI, which enables anyone to maintain them. With ipset-dns this is easy to do using LuCI "dhcp.@dnsmasq[0].server" entries. If it was added, I think ipset-dns could be deprecated. ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?
Hi Stijn, That was quick. Thanks! Jason ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?
On 08-10-17 16:20, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Jason A. Donenfeldwrote: >> In that case, I'll take a closer look at the patches LEDE ships for >> the package and merging them into the upstream repo. > If you don't wind up removing that, future packages won't need to > include that patch any longer: > https://git.zx2c4.com/ipset-dns/commit/?id=ade2cf88e933f4f90451e0a6171f0aa4a523f989 Updated in my staging tree: https://git.lede-project.org/ffd778ea Thanks, Stijn ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Jason A. Donenfeldwrote: > In that case, I'll take a closer look at the patches LEDE ships for > the package and merging them into the upstream repo. If you don't wind up removing that, future packages won't need to include that patch any longer: https://git.zx2c4.com/ipset-dns/commit/?id=ade2cf88e933f4f90451e0a6171f0aa4a523f989 ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Florian Fainelliwrote: > Still using ipset-dns here, thanks for the reminder, I should probably > migrate to dnsmasq now to achieve the same goals. There may be other > users out there though ;) Cool, okay, good to know! In that case, I'll take a closer look at the patches LEDE ships for the package and merging them into the upstream repo. Jason ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?
Hi, On 10/07/2017 04:48 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hey, > > I'm upstream on the ipset-dns project: > https://git.zx2c4.com/ipset-dns/about/ > > It's a part of a core LEDE repo: > https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=tree;f=package/network/services/ipset-dns > > Pretty soon after I wrote ipset-dns, I thought it was kind of a > hassle, and so I rewrote the whole thing instead as a patch to > dnsmasq, submitted it upstream to Simon, and it was accepted. This > seems to work much more easily than my original ipset-dns, and I > imagine it's what most people use for that kind of thing on LEDE. > Funny enough, when I look at the git repo for ipset-dns, on February > 15, 2013, I made the "initial commit." On the 23rd, 8 days later, I > added a note telling people to use dnsmasq instead. > > In spite of this, it went into LEDE, and I assume people used it in > between then and whenever my patch inside of dnsmasq was released in a > version that was inside of LEDE. > > But this was all years ago. > > So, I'm wondering: does anybody actually use ipset-dns? Does it have > any utility? As cool as it is having a piece of my code in the core > LEDE repo, I can't help wondering if it should be removed... Still using ipset-dns here, thanks for the reminder, I should probably migrate to dnsmasq now to achieve the same goals. There may be other users out there though ;) -- Florian ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
[LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?
Hey, I'm upstream on the ipset-dns project: https://git.zx2c4.com/ipset-dns/about/ It's a part of a core LEDE repo: https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=tree;f=package/network/services/ipset-dns Pretty soon after I wrote ipset-dns, I thought it was kind of a hassle, and so I rewrote the whole thing instead as a patch to dnsmasq, submitted it upstream to Simon, and it was accepted. This seems to work much more easily than my original ipset-dns, and I imagine it's what most people use for that kind of thing on LEDE. Funny enough, when I look at the git repo for ipset-dns, on February 15, 2013, I made the "initial commit." On the 23rd, 8 days later, I added a note telling people to use dnsmasq instead. In spite of this, it went into LEDE, and I assume people used it in between then and whenever my patch inside of dnsmasq was released in a version that was inside of LEDE. But this was all years ago. So, I'm wondering: does anybody actually use ipset-dns? Does it have any utility? As cool as it is having a piece of my code in the core LEDE repo, I can't help wondering if it should be removed... If somebody still uses it, great; that's the beauty of open source. But if not, it's something to think about removing maybe. Just FYI. Regards, Jason ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev