Jo-Philipp Wich [2017-07-12 23:34:13]:
Hi,
> Do you have an easy test case for this? Is piping ~16K plaintext to the
> logger enough to trigger the starvation? I'd like to understand the
> problem some more before judging the patch.
I was trying to fix probably similar issue back
On 2017-07-11 21:04, Ron Brash wrote:
> This patch fixes a logread starvation error, which occurs after many
> logs are generated (around 16k if defaults are used). The log read
> process seems to halt silently and yet continues running. A restart
> of the log services fixes it.
>
> This is
This patch fixes a logread starvation error, which occurs after many
logs are generated (around 16k if defaults are used). The log read
process seems to halt silently and yet continues running. A restart
of the log services fixes it.
This is problematic because logs should be logged, instead of