Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] fix uClibc-ng scanf check

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:54:57AM +0200, John Crispin wrote: > > configure.ac | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Applied, thanks. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com ___ Lede-dev mailing

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] fix uClibc-ng scanf check

Hi Waldemar, On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 17:16 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > Hi Alexey, > Alexey Brodkin wrote, > > > > > Hi Waldemar, > > > > On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 04:23 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > > > > > uClibc-ng tries to be compatible with GNU libc and defines > > > __GLIBC__ and

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] fix uClibc-ng scanf check

Hi Waldemar, On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 04:23 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > uClibc-ng tries to be compatible with GNU libc and defines > __GLIBC__ and pretend to be version 2.2. > We once changed it to 2.10, but then some hard to fix problems > in different software packages (gcc) occured. > It

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] fix uClibc-ng scanf check

Hi Waldemar On 03/06/2016 04:23, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > uClibc-ng tries to be compatible with GNU libc and defines > __GLIBC__ and pretend to be version 2.2. > We once changed it to 2.10, but then some hard to fix problems > in different software packages (gcc) occured. > It would be better

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] fix uClibc-ng scanf check

uClibc-ng tries to be compatible with GNU libc and defines __GLIBC__ and pretend to be version 2.2. We once changed it to 2.10, but then some hard to fix problems in different software packages (gcc) occured. It would be better if we disable the special GNU libc checks for uClibc-ng here.