On 07-10-17 14:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> What is your opinion on this topic? Am I missing some arguments?
> Currently I would prefer solution 3 going with kernel 4.9 and 4.14.
I actually preferred to have a 2nd major release in 2017, using only
kernel 4.9, and then a 3rd major release early 2018
Hello Hauke,
On 07.10.2017 13:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
[...]
What is your opinion on this topic? Am I missing some arguments?
Currently I would prefer solution 3 going with kernel 4.9 and 4.14.
I prefer option 3 as well.
--
Cheers,
Piotr
___
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
* Port the generic patches
what are the 'generic patches' and is there an effort to get them upstream so
that they don't need to be ported in each release?
* Make all the out of tree modules work with it
is there any work being done to make
I would go for option 1
There is little to gain from the new kernel and lots to risk in terms of
time, compatibility, additional work.
On 07/10/17 12:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
We had some discussions in IRC about the kernel version which should be
used in the next major release after
Hi Hauke,
I prefer option 3 as well.
~ Jo
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
