On 09/02/2017 18:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 3 February 2017 at 12:29, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> In LEDE we have quite a lot of DTS files that hasn't been upstreamed.
>> They often contain no licensing info.
>>
>> Upstream Linux maintainers prefer/require clear BSD-compatible
>> license, see e.g
On 3 February 2017 at 12:29, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> In LEDE we have quite a lot of DTS files that hasn't been upstreamed.
> They often contain no licensing info.
>
> Upstream Linux maintainers prefer/require clear BSD-compatible
> license, see e.g.:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/4/707
>
> Some pe
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 12:29:35PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Upstream Linux maintainers prefer/require clear BSD-compatible
> license, see e.g.:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/4/707
I would be a little more careful with such statements, that seems
like a wrong generalization to me concerning l
In LEDE we have quite a lot of DTS files that hasn't been upstreamed.
They often contain no licensing info.
Upstream Linux maintainers prefer/require clear BSD-compatible
license, see e.g.:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/4/707
Some people may not agree such files are copyrightable at all, but
most