On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Karl Palsson wrote:
> >
> > Daniel Golle wrote:
> >> Hi Karl,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:17:38PM +, Karl Palsson wrote:
> >> > Instead of blindly enabling the odhcpd v6 server and RA server on the
> >> > lan port, only do that if the lan port isn't
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Karl Palsson wrote:
>
> Daniel Golle wrote:
>> Hi Karl,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:17:38PM +, Karl Palsson wrote:
>> > Instead of blindly enabling the odhcpd v6 server and RA server on the
>> > lan port, only do that if the lan port isn't set to DHCP.
>
On 01.09.2017 00:35, Karl Palsson wrote:
Daniel Golle wrote:
Hi Karl,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:17:38PM +, Karl Palsson wrote:
Instead of blindly enabling the odhcpd v6 server and RA server on the
lan port, only do that if the lan port isn't set to DHCP.
This prevents the unhelpful case
Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:17:38PM +, Karl Palsson wrote:
> > Instead of blindly enabling the odhcpd v6 server and RA server on the
> > lan port, only do that if the lan port isn't set to DHCP.
> >
> > This prevents the unhelpful case of a device being a d
Hi Karl,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:17:38PM +, Karl Palsson wrote:
> Instead of blindly enabling the odhcpd v6 server and RA server on the
> lan port, only do that if the lan port isn't set to DHCP.
>
> This prevents the unhelpful case of a device being a dhcpv4 client and
> v6 server on the
Instead of blindly enabling the odhcpd v6 server and RA server on the
lan port, only do that if the lan port isn't set to DHCP.
This prevents the unhelpful case of a device being a dhcpv4 client and
v6 server on the same ethernet port.
Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson
--
Should other protocols be e
