Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 16:55 -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:22 PM, L. D. Pinney wrote: > > It's a Development List ... no place for corporate agendas. > > I think you are making a good point here, being that there is only one > lede list, presently, and

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

>>>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil. >>>>> Yes of course large corporations are well known for altruistic >>>>> behavior. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Lang <da...@lan

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

ks on something doesn't make it evil. >> >> Yes of course large corporations are well known for altruistic >> >> behavior. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: >> >>> Is it really pushing a corpor

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

t;>> >>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil. >>> >>> David Lang >>> >>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote: >>> >>>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:29:08 -0500 >>>> From: L. D. Pinney <

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

n't make it evil. David Lang On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:29:08 -0500 From: L. D. Pinney <ldpin...@gmail.com> To: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists? Postings to

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

<ldpin...@gmail.com> >>> To: David Lang <da...@lang.hm> >>> Cc: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> >>> >>> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists? >>> >>> Just becau

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

well known for altruistic behavior. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is it really pushing a corporate agenda to coordinate efforts to make >>>>> LEDE/Op

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

Pinney <ldpin...@gmail.com> To: David Lang <da...@lang.hm> Cc: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists? Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil. Yes of course large cor

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:10:36 -0500 >> From: L. D. Pinney <ldpin...@gmail.com> >> To: David Lang <da...@lang.hm> >> Cc: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> >> >> Subject: Re

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

EDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists? Postings to the LEDE Development List should be devoted to technical development issues. Persons from prplfoundation et.al should respect conventional mail list etiquette such as found

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

mail.com> >> To: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> >> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists? >> >> >> Postings to the LEDE Development List should be devoted to technical >> development issues. >> >>

Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

Postings to the LEDE Development List should be devoted to technical development issues. Persons from prplfoundation et.al should respect conventional mail list etiquette such as found here : http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php Pay particular attention to 4, 7, and 10 on the