Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?

2017-11-26 Thread jarellczc
2017-11-27 9:37 GMT+08:00 : > Patch submitted to enable configuring dnsmasq IPset domain rules > through LuCI > > https://github.com/openwrt/luci/pull/1453 About 1.3 billion people need this. > > ___ > Lede-dev mailing list >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?

2017-11-26 Thread Joe Mullally
Woops, that should have been in reply to http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2017-October/009225.html On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:37 AM, wrote: > Patch submitted to enable configuring dnsmasq IPset domain rules > through LuCI > >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?

2017-11-26 Thread josephusmullally
Patch submitted to enable configuring dnsmasq IPset domain rules through LuCI https://github.com/openwrt/luci/pull/1453 ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?

2017-10-08 Thread Joe Mullally
One usecase not currently supported is managing dnsmasq ipset lists through LuCI, which enables anyone to maintain them. With ipset-dns this is easy to do using LuCI "dhcp.@dnsmasq[0].server" entries. If it was added, I think ipset-dns could be deprecated.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?

2017-10-08 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Hi Stijn, That was quick. Thanks! Jason ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?

2017-10-08 Thread Stijn Tintel
On 08-10-17 16:20, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >> In that case, I'll take a closer look at the patches LEDE ships for >> the package and merging them into the upstream repo. > If you don't wind up removing that, future

Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?

2017-10-08 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > In that case, I'll take a closer look at the patches LEDE ships for > the package and merging them into the upstream repo. If you don't wind up removing that, future packages won't need to include that patch any longer:

Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?

2017-10-08 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Still using ipset-dns here, thanks for the reminder, I should probably > migrate to dnsmasq now to achieve the same goals. There may be other > users out there though ;) Cool, okay, good to know! In that case, I'll

Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?

2017-10-08 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hi, On 10/07/2017 04:48 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hey, > > I'm upstream on the ipset-dns project: > https://git.zx2c4.com/ipset-dns/about/ > > It's a part of a core LEDE repo: > https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=tree;f=package/network/services/ipset-dns > > Pretty soon after I

[LEDE-DEV] ipset-dns - does anybody actually use this?

2017-10-07 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Hey, I'm upstream on the ipset-dns project: https://git.zx2c4.com/ipset-dns/about/ It's a part of a core LEDE repo: https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=tree;f=package/network/services/ipset-dns Pretty soon after I wrote ipset-dns, I thought it was kind of a hassle, and so I rewrote the