Re: [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

2018-04-05 Thread Jaap Buurman 
Dear John Crispin and Felix Fietkau,

Could either of you please consider moving the Ramips target to kernel
4.14 before the fork to 18.04 happens? Without it, the new
flow_offload goodies won't be usable on Ramips, which would be a shame
in my opinion. Or are there good reasons to keep the target on kernel
4.9 for now?

Yours sincerely,

Jaap Buurman



On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Hauke Mehrtens  wrote:
> On 04/02/2018 10:54 AM, Jaap Buurman wrote:
>> Dear Hauke,
>>
>> Quick question from my side: I was wondering why Ramips will probably
>> stay with 4.9, even though the patches for 4.14 have been in master
>> for quite a while. Since flow_offload is part of master, and it
>> requires 4.14, I think 4.14 would be a very welcome addition for
>> Ramips. My 2 cents :)
>>
>> Yours sincerely,
>>
>> Jaap Buurman
>
> Hi Jaap,
>
> I do not know what Felix's and John's plans are for this target. Fi this
> should go to kernel 4.14 we should switch soon.
>
> Hauke

___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

2018-04-02 Thread Hauke Mehrtens 
On 04/02/2018 10:54 AM, Jaap Buurman wrote:
> Dear Hauke,
> 
> Quick question from my side: I was wondering why Ramips will probably
> stay with 4.9, even though the patches for 4.14 have been in master
> for quite a while. Since flow_offload is part of master, and it
> requires 4.14, I think 4.14 would be a very welcome addition for
> Ramips. My 2 cents :)
> 
> Yours sincerely,
> 
> Jaap Buurman

Hi Jaap,

I do not know what Felix's and John's plans are for this target. Fi this
should go to kernel 4.14 we should switch soon.

Hauke

___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

2018-04-02 Thread Jaap Buurman 
Dear Hauke,

Quick question from my side: I was wondering why Ramips will probably
stay with 4.9, even though the patches for 4.14 have been in master
for quite a while. Since flow_offload is part of master, and it
requires 4.14, I think 4.14 would be a very welcome addition for
Ramips. My 2 cents :)

Yours sincerely,

Jaap Buurman

___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

2018-04-01 Thread Stijn Segers 
Hauke Mehrtens  schreef op 1 april 2018 16:48:52 CEST:
>The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending
>on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14
>will not be included in the next release.
>
>I did some overview of the kernel version some months ago here:
>http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2017-October/009446.html
>http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2018-February/011308.html
>
>Here is the current situation as of today:
>
>
>The following targets are on kernel 4.14 and are fine:
>* apm821xx
>* archs38
>* armvirt
>* bcm53xx
>* cns3xxx
>* imx6
>* ipq40xx
>* kirkwood
>* malta
>* mediatek
>* mvebu
>* mxs
>* octeon
>* octeontx
>* pistachio
>* sunxi
>* x86
>
>
>The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
>* ar71xx
>* ar7
>* arc770
>* at91
>   There are some patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list,
>   but it looks like nobody with the hardware wants to take care
>   of them.
>* ath25
>* brcm2708
>* brcm47xx
>   There is a pull request with kernel 4.14 patches on github, we
>   will probably stay with kernel 4.9 for the next release.
>* brcm63xx
>   patches for 4.14 are available in master
>* ipq806x
>* ixp4xx
>* lantiq
>   patches for 4.14 are available in master, we will probably stay
>   with kernel 4.9 for the next release.
>* layerscape
>* mpc85xx
>* omap
>   There is a pull request with kernel 4.14 patches on github.
>* orion
>* ramips
>   patches for 4.14 are available in master, we will probably stay

John, are there any blockers preventing a move to 4.14? Been running it since 
Felix pushed support; haven't experienced any issues.

Stijn

>   with kernel 4.9 for the next release.
>* rb532
>* uml
>
>
>The following targets are on kernel 4.4 and will probably not be
>included in the next release:
>* gemini
>   There are patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list, we will
>   probably get them in before the release and ship this with 4.14
>* oxnas
>* zynq
>
>The following targets are on kernel 3.18 and will probably not be
>included in the next release:
>* adm5120
>* adm8668
>* au1000
>* mcs814x
>* ppc40x
>* ppc44x
>* xburst
>
>
>This target is on kernel 4.1 (WTF):
>* omap24xx
>
>
>All the targets which are not on kernel 4.9 or 4.14 will probably not
>be
>included in the next release, I also haven't seen any activity for any
>of them expected the gemini target to get support for more recent
>kernel
>versions, if you need them please take care now.
>
>I am fine with the current status and do not see this as a blocker for
>the next release, all important targets are on either 4.9 or 4.14, if
>someone wants to see his target on a more recent version we are still
>open for patches.
>
>Hauke
>
>___
>Lede-dev mailing list
>Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
>http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev


___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

2018-04-01 Thread Hauke Mehrtens 
The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending
on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14
will not be included in the next release.

I did some overview of the kernel version some months ago here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2017-October/009446.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2018-February/011308.html

Here is the current situation as of today:


The following targets are on kernel 4.14 and are fine:
* apm821xx
* archs38
* armvirt
* bcm53xx
* cns3xxx
* imx6
* ipq40xx
* kirkwood
* malta
* mediatek
* mvebu
* mxs
* octeon
* octeontx
* pistachio
* sunxi
* x86


The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
* ar71xx
* ar7
* arc770
* at91
There are some patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list,
but it looks like nobody with the hardware wants to take care
of them.
* ath25
* brcm2708
* brcm47xx
There is a pull request with kernel 4.14 patches on github, we
will probably stay with kernel 4.9 for the next release.
* brcm63xx
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* ipq806x
* ixp4xx
* lantiq
patches for 4.14 are available in master, we will probably stay
with kernel 4.9 for the next release.
* layerscape
* mpc85xx
* omap
There is a pull request with kernel 4.14 patches on github.
* orion
* ramips
patches for 4.14 are available in master, we will probably stay
with kernel 4.9 for the next release.
* rb532
* uml


The following targets are on kernel 4.4 and will probably not be
included in the next release:
* gemini
There are patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list, we will
probably get them in before the release and ship this with 4.14
* oxnas
* zynq

The following targets are on kernel 3.18 and will probably not be
included in the next release:
* adm5120
* adm8668
* au1000
* mcs814x
* ppc40x
* ppc44x
* xburst


This target is on kernel 4.1 (WTF):
* omap24xx


All the targets which are not on kernel 4.9 or 4.14 will probably not be
included in the next release, I also haven't seen any activity for any
of them expected the gemini target to get support for more recent kernel
versions, if you need them please take care now.

I am fine with the current status and do not see this as a blocker for
the next release, all important targets are on either 4.9 or 4.14, if
someone wants to see his target on a more recent version we are still
open for patches.

Hauke

___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

2018-02-20 Thread Zoltan HERPAI 

Hi,

Michael Heimpold wrote:

Hi,

Am Sonntag, 18. Februar 2018, 22:43:42 CET schrieb Hauke Mehrtens:
  

...

The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
...
* mxs
...



a few weeks ago, I was in contact with Zoltan who started working
on 4.14 support for mxs. I found some patches in his staging repo
and added some patches on top.
I've pushed this in a Github branch:
https://github.com/mhei/source/tree/mxs-4.14

I run tested this on both I2SE Duckbill devices and Olimex OLinuXino
Maxi boards - no obvious problems so far, so I think we can go ahead
for this platform with 4.14.
  

Thanks Michael, this is pushed to master now.

Regards,
Zoltan H


___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

2018-02-19 Thread p . wassi 
Hi John,

> currently units will have ~300k on flash for mac files

So, by 'for mac files' you mean the /arch/.../mach-*.c ?
Then there'd additionally be some kBytes for etc/board.d/* and all the
other case statements in the shell scripts at other locations.
(-> per-device-root-filesystem; what's the current status here?)

Anyway, for ath79: any help needed for converting the mach-files to dts?

Best regards,
P. Wassi

___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

2018-02-19 Thread Michael Heimpold 
Hi,

Am Sonntag, 18. Februar 2018, 22:43:42 CET schrieb Hauke Mehrtens:
> ...
> 
> The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
> ...
> * mxs
> ...

a few weeks ago, I was in contact with Zoltan who started working
on 4.14 support for mxs. I found some patches in his staging repo
and added some patches on top.
I've pushed this in a Github branch:
https://github.com/mhei/source/tree/mxs-4.14

I run tested this on both I2SE Duckbill devices and Olimex OLinuXino
Maxi boards - no obvious problems so far, so I think we can go ahead
for this platform with 4.14.

Regards,
Michael


___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

2018-02-19 Thread John Crispin 



On 19/02/18 12:09, Arjen de Korte wrote:

Citeren John Crispin :


On 18/02/18 22:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:

The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending
on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14
will not be included in the next release.

I did some overview of the kernel version some months ago here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2017-October/009446.html

Here is the current situation as of today:

The following targets are on kernel 4.14 and are fine:
* apm821xx
* archs38
* armvirt
* cns3xxx
* malta
* mediatek
* octeon
* octeontx
* sunxi
* x86

The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
* ar71xx
* ar7
* arc770
* at91
There are some patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list
waiting for response from author
* ath25
* bcm53xx
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* brcm2708
* brcm47xx
* brcm63xx
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* imx6
There are some patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list
which is being worked on
* ipq806x
* ixp4xx
* kirkwood
* lantiq
patches for 4.14 are in Mathias Kresin's staging tree.
* layerscape
* mpc85xx
* mvebu
patches for 4.14 are available in master
I would like to get this to kernel 4.14 by default soon.
* mxs
* omap
* orion
* pistachio
* ramips
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* rb532
* uml

The following targets are on kernel 4.4 and will probably not be
included in the next release:
* gemini
* oxnas
* zynq

The following targets are on kernel 3.18 and will probably not be
included in the next release:
* adm5120
* adm8668
* au1000
* mcs814x
I have patches which port this target to 4.4 in my tree, but
nobody tested them.
https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/hauke/staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kernel-4.4 


* ppc40x
* ppc44x
* xburst
I have patches which port this target to 4.4 in my tree, but
nobody tested them
https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/hauke/staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kernel-4.4 



This target is on kernel 4.1 (WTF):
* omap24xx

All the targets which are not on kernel 4.9 or 4.14 will probably 
not be

included in the next release, I also haven't seen any activity for any
of them to get support for more recent kernel versions, if you need 
them

please take care now.

Hauke


Hi Hauke,

I planned to make that list today, thanks for taking care of it !. I 
would like to see ar71xx and ramips stay on v4.9, regardless of there 
being patches for v4.14. I would also like to see ar71xx never being 
bumped to v4.14, I spent a few days last week revamping my old ath79 
port and would like to see a hard cut, moving QCA mips target to OF 
only post release.


Out of curiosity, what is the reason not to bump ar71xx to v4.14? 
Looking at the projected EOL of kernels, the move from v4.4 (Feb, 
2022) to v4.9 (Jan, 2019) drastically reduced the time remaining for 
this platform.




we have long planned to move ar71xx over to OF and decided that this 
might be the right time to do so. currently units will have ~300k on 
flash for mac files and ~1,5M in ram for them. the target is pretty 
messy at places, so moving it to OF will only give us advantages.


    John



    John


___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev





___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev



___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

2018-02-19 Thread Arjen de Korte 

Citeren John Crispin :


On 18/02/18 22:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:

The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending
on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14
will not be included in the next release.

I did some overview of the kernel version some months ago here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2017-October/009446.html

Here is the current situation as of today:

The following targets are on kernel 4.14 and are fine:
* apm821xx
* archs38
* armvirt
* cns3xxx
* malta
* mediatek
* octeon
* octeontx
* sunxi
* x86

The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
* ar71xx
* ar7
* arc770
* at91
There are some patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list
waiting for response from author
* ath25
* bcm53xx
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* brcm2708
* brcm47xx
* brcm63xx
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* imx6
There are some patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list
which is being worked on
* ipq806x
* ixp4xx
* kirkwood
* lantiq
patches for 4.14 are in Mathias Kresin's staging tree.
* layerscape
* mpc85xx
* mvebu
patches for 4.14 are available in master
I would like to get this to kernel 4.14 by default soon.
* mxs
* omap
* orion
* pistachio
* ramips
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* rb532
* uml

The following targets are on kernel 4.4 and will probably not be
included in the next release:
* gemini
* oxnas
* zynq

The following targets are on kernel 3.18 and will probably not be
included in the next release:
* adm5120
* adm8668
* au1000
* mcs814x
I have patches which port this target to 4.4 in my tree, but
nobody tested them.

https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/hauke/staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kernel-4.4
* ppc40x
* ppc44x
* xburst
I have patches which port this target to 4.4 in my tree, but
nobody tested them

https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/hauke/staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kernel-4.4

This target is on kernel 4.1 (WTF):
* omap24xx

All the targets which are not on kernel 4.9 or 4.14 will probably not be
included in the next release, I also haven't seen any activity for any
of them to get support for more recent kernel versions, if you need them
please take care now.

Hauke


Hi Hauke,

I planned to make that list today, thanks for taking care of it !. I  
would like to see ar71xx and ramips stay on v4.9, regardless of  
there being patches for v4.14. I would also like to see ar71xx never  
being bumped to v4.14, I spent a few days last week revamping my old  
ath79 port and would like to see a hard cut, moving QCA mips target  
to OF only post release.


Out of curiosity, what is the reason not to bump ar71xx to v4.14?  
Looking at the projected EOL of kernels, the move from v4.4 (Feb,  
2022) to v4.9 (Jan, 2019) drastically reduced the time remaining for  
this platform.



    John


___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev





___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

2018-02-18 Thread John Crispin 



On 18/02/18 22:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:

The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending
on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14
will not be included in the next release.

I did some overview of the kernel version some months ago here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2017-October/009446.html

Here is the current situation as of today:

The following targets are on kernel 4.14 and are fine:
* apm821xx
* archs38
* armvirt
* cns3xxx
* malta
* mediatek
* octeon
* octeontx
* sunxi
* x86

The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
* ar71xx
* ar7
* arc770
* at91
There are some patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list
waiting for response from author
* ath25
* bcm53xx
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* brcm2708
* brcm47xx
* brcm63xx
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* imx6
There are some patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list
which is being worked on
* ipq806x
* ixp4xx
* kirkwood
* lantiq
patches for 4.14 are in Mathias Kresin's staging tree.
* layerscape
* mpc85xx
* mvebu
patches for 4.14 are available in master
I would like to get this to kernel 4.14 by default soon.
* mxs
* omap
* orion
* pistachio
* ramips
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* rb532
* uml

The following targets are on kernel 4.4 and will probably not be
included in the next release:
* gemini
* oxnas
* zynq

The following targets are on kernel 3.18 and will probably not be
included in the next release:
* adm5120
* adm8668
* au1000
* mcs814x
I have patches which port this target to 4.4 in my tree, but
nobody tested them.

https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/hauke/staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kernel-4.4
* ppc40x
* ppc44x
* xburst
I have patches which port this target to 4.4 in my tree, but
nobody tested them

https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/hauke/staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kernel-4.4

This target is on kernel 4.1 (WTF):
* omap24xx

All the targets which are not on kernel 4.9 or 4.14 will probably not be
included in the next release, I also haven't seen any activity for any
of them to get support for more recent kernel versions, if you need them
please take care now.

Hauke


Hi Hauke,

I planned to make that list today, thanks for taking care of it !. I 
would like to see ar71xx and ramips stay on v4.9, regardless of there 
being patches for v4.14. I would also like to see ar71xx never being 
bumped to v4.14, I spent a few days last week revamping my old ath79 
port and would like to see a hard cut, moving QCA mips target to OF only 
post release.


    John


___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

[LEDE-DEV] kernel version status

2018-02-18 Thread Hauke Mehrtens 
The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending
on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14
will not be included in the next release.

I did some overview of the kernel version some months ago here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2017-October/009446.html

Here is the current situation as of today:

The following targets are on kernel 4.14 and are fine:
* apm821xx
* archs38
* armvirt
* cns3xxx
* malta
* mediatek
* octeon
* octeontx
* sunxi
* x86

The following targets are on kernel 4.9 and are fine:
* ar71xx
* ar7
* arc770
* at91
There are some patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list
waiting for response from author
* ath25
* bcm53xx
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* brcm2708
* brcm47xx
* brcm63xx
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* imx6
There are some patches for kernel 4.14 on the mailing list
which is being worked on
* ipq806x
* ixp4xx
* kirkwood
* lantiq
patches for 4.14 are in Mathias Kresin's staging tree.
* layerscape
* mpc85xx
* mvebu
patches for 4.14 are available in master
I would like to get this to kernel 4.14 by default soon.
* mxs
* omap
* orion
* pistachio
* ramips
patches for 4.14 are available in master
* rb532
* uml

The following targets are on kernel 4.4 and will probably not be
included in the next release:
* gemini
* oxnas
* zynq

The following targets are on kernel 3.18 and will probably not be
included in the next release:
* adm5120
* adm8668
* au1000
* mcs814x
I have patches which port this target to 4.4 in my tree, but
nobody tested them.

https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/hauke/staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kernel-4.4
* ppc40x
* ppc44x
* xburst
I have patches which port this target to 4.4 in my tree, but
nobody tested them

https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/hauke/staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kernel-4.4

This target is on kernel 4.1 (WTF):
* omap24xx

All the targets which are not on kernel 4.9 or 4.14 will probably not be
included in the next release, I also haven't seen any activity for any
of them to get support for more recent kernel versions, if you need them
please take care now.

Hauke

___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev