[LEDE-DEV] LEDE Forum now open for business

Hi all - Here it is: https://forum.lede-project.org You can now self-register without admin approval. With a lot of help and comments from a bunch of the current users, I think we now have a very usable site. We may still tweak the style, layouts and options as we mature the site so don't be

Re: [LEDE-DEV] LEDE Forum - Startup mode

Just my humble opinion. That piece of software looks great. Isn't there any other free (as in beer) alternative? -- Vincenzo Romano - NotOrAnd.IT Information Technologies -- NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS 2016-10-25 17:03 GMT+02:00 Ted Hess : > Hi all - > > First off,

[LEDE-DEV] LEDE Forum - Startup mode

Hi all - First off, thanks for all the feedback, suggestions and volunteers. For starters, and perhaps to become permanent, we have set up a copy of Discourse (http://discourse.org) for testing and evaluation. It is a very popular package for new organizations and it has a pretty active community

[LEDE-DEV] lede forum

moeller0> I am not advocating to keep the ban-hammer swinging moeller0> all times, but there should be some feed-back and moeller0> potential consequences of prolonged and repeated lack of nice-ness. I am of the same opinion. The OpenWrt forum didn't need any moderation for long time (years!),

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

On 07/27/2016 10:43 PM, Rich Brown wrote: > Do you know of any forums that you could recommend? we have been using https://nodebb.org/ and it is quite good. ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

> On Jul 27, 2016, at 4:06 PM, Russell Senior wrote: > >> "Rich" == Rich Brown writes: > > Rich> Another thought: I strongly recommend that any forum software we > Rich> choose support Markdown. BBcode was astonishing in the last 90's >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

> "Rich" == Rich Brown writes: Rich> Another thought: I strongly recommend that any forum software we Rich> choose support Markdown. BBcode was astonishing in the last 90's Rich> when it first came out. But requiring BBcode to to make decent Rich> formatting for

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

Another thought: I strongly recommend that any forum software we choose support Markdown. BBcode was astonishing in the last 90's when it first came out. But requiring BBcode to to make decent formatting for messages is a big disincentive 15 years later. Rich

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

Folks, I was planning to advocate for a forum as well. I have enjoyed using the Discourse forum (http://discourse.org) with several projects. (If you haven't seen it, it's a new forum system, designed by people who have used lots of bad ones, and intend to fix those problems.) I have some

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

Folks, I was planning to advocate for a forum as well. I have enjoyed using the Discourse forum (http://discourse.org) with several projects. (If you haven't seen it, it's a new forum system, designed by people who have used lots of bad ones, and intend to fix those problems.) I have some

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

A bit more setup, but fudforum (Fast Uncompromising Discussion Forum, fudforum.org) can integrate with nttp, which mailman can then integrate with mailing lists, allowing for full interaction between people accessing the forum through all three methods. David Lang On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, A.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:01:11 +0100 tapper wrote: > Hi can we make sure that the software we choose will be OK with a > screen reader pleas. The openwrt and the Gargoyle forums are both > very good for blind folks to get around with a screen reader thanks. +1 Also,

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

Hi i have bin looking around at forums on the web and it seems that discourse, is not good with a screen reader. From what i can see phpBB seems to be the best for a11y. On 25/07/2016 12:01, tapper wrote: On 25/07/2016 11:49, Micha Stöcker wrote: Am 25.07.2016 um 12:37 schrieb Andrew |

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

On 25/07/2016 11:49, Micha Stöcker wrote: Am 25.07.2016 um 12:37 schrieb Andrew | PolkaSpots: https://www.discourse.org/ is not bad either. i have used discourse, it's a little bit bloated in my opinion. but if resources are no problem it is also a good alternatvice imho. Micha Hi can we

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

Am 25.07.2016 um 12:37 schrieb Andrew | PolkaSpots: > https://www.discourse.org/ is not bad either. i have used discourse, it's a little bit bloated in my opinion. but if resources are no problem it is also a good alternatvice imho. Micha signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

Am 25.07.2016 um 08:19 schrieb A. Benz: > PhpBB or SMF (Simple Machines Forum) are popular free choices and > take a minute or so to setup. i would rather give http://flarum.org a shot. it's new, it's shiny and in my opinion very lightweight compared to the two mentioned "oldies" :) Micha

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

Hi Ted and all, PhpBB or SMF (Simple Machines Forum) are popular free choices and take a minute or so to setup. The other day on IRC I had a few people telling me how bad of an idea a forum is, and now it seems to be on the agenda ;) I'd say set up the forum, content and mods will be done

Re: [LEDE-DEV] lede forum

On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 16:37 +0200, moeller0 wrote: > > > > On Jul 24, 2016, at 15:41 , tapper wrote: > > > > Hi with the ssl sert being messed up on the openwrt forum we really need a > > forum for lede. I don't know how to set one up but wen one is put up i wood > >

[LEDE-DEV] lede forum

Hi with the ssl sert being messed up on the openwrt forum we really need a forum for lede. I don't know how to set one up but wen one is put up i wood like to be a admin to help with noobs and getting rid of spam. I have bin a admin on the Gargoyle forum now for a long time and like helping