[LEDE-DEV] Kernel symbol dependencies and KCONFIG usage for kernel packages

2016-07-02 Thread Baptiste Jonglez
Hi, I am packaging a new kernel module (wireguard), the package is currently here [1]. However, I have some trouble understanding what KCONFIG does. Wireguard needs a few kernel options, so I thought that KCONFIG was the place to declare such dependencies:

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Kernel symbol dependencies and KCONFIG usage for kernel packages

2016-07-02 Thread John Crispin
On 02/07/2016 15:20, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > Hi, > > I am packaging a new kernel module (wireguard), the package is currently here > [1]. > > However, I have some trouble understanding what KCONFIG does. Wireguard > needs a few kernel options, so I thought that KCONFIG was the place to >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Kernel symbol dependencies and KCONFIG usage for kernel packages

2016-07-02 Thread John Crispin
On 02/07/2016 15:20, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > Hi, > > I am packaging a new kernel module (wireguard), the package is currently here > [1]. > > However, I have some trouble understanding what KCONFIG does. Wireguard > needs a few kernel options, so I thought that KCONFIG was the place to >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Kernel symbol dependencies and KCONFIG usage for kernel packages

2016-07-02 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 07/02/2016 03:20 PM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > Hi, > > I am packaging a new kernel module (wireguard), the package is currently here > [1]. > > However, I have some trouble understanding what KCONFIG does. Wireguard > needs a few kernel options, so I thought that KCONFIG was the place to >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Kernel symbol dependencies and KCONFIG usage for kernel packages

2016-07-02 Thread Baptiste Jonglez
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 03:48:36PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > However, I have some trouble understanding what KCONFIG does. Wireguard > > needs a few kernel options, so I thought that KCONFIG was the place to > > declare such dependencies: > > > > > >

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/5] br2684ctl: set the MAC address configured for the atm bridge using

2016-07-02 Thread Mathias Kresin
If an ESI is set, it will be used as MAC address for the nas0 interface. According to the ESI man page, changes to the ESI are not automatically propagated throughout the system and therefore esi should be used early during system. Setting the ESI before creating the nas interface should be

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 3/5] lantiq: pass MAC address to the ATM bridge helper

2016-07-02 Thread Mathias Kresin
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin --- target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network b/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network index

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 5/5] lantiq: DGN3500: use the MAC address from uboot env

2016-07-02 Thread Mathias Kresin
Extract the base MAC address from the u-boot environment instead of relying on a properly passed ethaddr kernel command-line parameter. Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin --- target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH web] docs: fix rpcd page header syntax

2016-07-02 Thread Rafał Miłecki
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki --- docs/rpcd.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/rpcd.txt b/docs/rpcd.txt index 211..3756ee3 100644 --- a/docs/rpcd.txt +++ b/docs/rpcd.txt @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- --- RPC daemon -

Re: [LEDE-DEV] kmod-udptunnel{4, 6} packages are empty (Was: Kernel symbol dependencies and KCONFIG usage for kernel packages)

2016-07-02 Thread Baptiste Jonglez
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:55:28PM +0200, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > I think I found the cause of the issue: the packages kmod-udptunnel4.ipk > and kmod-udptunnel6.ipk are generated, but are empty (no .ko file). When > I activate the kernel symbol in kernel_menuconfig, these packages do > provide

Re: [LEDE-DEV] kmod-udptunnel{4, 6} packages are empty (Was: Kernel symbol dependencies and KCONFIG usage for kernel packages)

2016-07-02 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 07/02/2016 05:38 PM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:55:28PM +0200, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: >> I think I found the cause of the issue: the packages kmod-udptunnel4.ipk >> and kmod-udptunnel6.ipk are generated, but are empty (no .ko file). When >> I activate the kernel

[LEDE-DEV] procd: patch to support busybox mkfs.ext2

2016-07-02 Thread Luke McKee
Hi guys, This is a little one. Busybox mkfs.ext2 works and with this setup the ext4 module can mount /tmp without a journal. See #22666 I tested it. Also the Makefile for procd doesn't have any dependencies for busybox CONFIG_BUSYBOX_CONFIG_MKFS_EXT2=y OR e2fsprogs. See the zram-swap Makefile.

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/5] uci-defaults: add MAC address option to atm bridge

2016-07-02 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
On 02/07/16 16:00, Mathias Kresin wrote: Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin --- package/base-files/files/bin/config_generate | 5 +++-- package/base-files/files/lib/functions/uci-defaults.sh | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [LEDE-DEV] procd: patch to support busybox mkfs.ext2

2016-07-02 Thread Luke McKee
Actually lzo compresses better but they are both fast. lz4 is faster on embedded devices. zram-swap should use lz4 if available and the patch can be as it was.http://blog.jpountz.net/post/28092106032/wow-lz4-is-fast lz4 has compression levels. in any case, speed > size on embedded devices.

[LEDE-DEV] Lede r881 - how to get better Wireless performace ?

2016-07-02 Thread Dennis Schneck
Hello, i use a TP Link Archer C7 v2 with LEDE r811. But the Wireless performace (2,4GHz) is not optimal. Are the parameter or something else to tune the performace ? If use other Firmware in the same Environment get better transfer rates.   CPU use is near 10% at the speed test. Free memory near