Re: [LEDE-DEV] Issues with xtables-addons after rebasing today

Citeren John Crispin : On 23/08/17 07:32, Koen Vandeputte wrote: Hi John, This the the hafd part. I've spend a full day on it and found this: Full clone + Check out: "364befe kernel: update 4.4 to 4.4.83" --> Build OK Full clone + Check out: "1f06858 mediatek: update

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Issues with xtables-addons after rebasing today

Citeren John Crispin : On 23/08/17 05:34, Philip Prindeville wrote: On Aug 22, 2017, at 1:56 PM, Arjen de Korte wrote: Citeren Philip Prindeville : Found the issue, and posted PR #1308 to fix it. One-line

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Issues with xtables-addons after rebasing today

On 23/08/17 08:32, Arjen de Korte wrote: Citeren John Crispin : On 23/08/17 07:32, Koen Vandeputte wrote: Hi John, This the the hafd part. I've spend a full day on it and found this: Full clone + Check out: "364befe kernel: update 4.4 to 4.4.83" --> Build OK Full

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Issues with xtables-addons after rebasing today

On 23/08/17 07:32, Koen Vandeputte wrote: Hi John, This the the hafd part. I've spend a full day on it and found this: Full clone + Check out: "364befe kernel: update 4.4 to 4.4.83" --> Build OK Full clone + Check out: "1f06858 mediatek: update to latest kernel patchset from v4.13-rc"

[LEDE-DEV] [RFC] kernel-packages: new package (adapted from `kernel` package from core)

Hey, A while back I opened a PR: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/4407 Etienne prompted me to try the ML too. The gist of it is: g1) LEDE core does not want to package all/certain in-tree kmods (bloat reasons, which is reasonable) g2) The `packages` feed would like to have certain

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/2] toolchain: gcc: drop MIPS patch

Hi, Based on my test, it works well even if you keep this mips patch, upstream already update libtommath and libtomcrypt to latest, and I can confirm the update to these two libs fixes dropbear misbehavior on mips. https://github.com/mkj/dropbear/commit/a79b61517bc7123250d0e2dc21dc18deccf0bb64

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Issues with ncurses (Was: Issues with xtables-addons after rebasing today)

On 2017-08-23 10:39, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: On 23-08-17, Koen Vandeputte wrote: Now this one pops up again (reported by Mauro Mozzarelli yesterday): find

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Issues with xtables-addons after rebasing today

On 2017-08-23 09:55, John Crispin wrote: pushed a fix, please retest John ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev Hi John, Just done a full rebuild. It doesn't whine anymore

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Issues with xtables-addons after rebasing today

Wrong thread. My apologies On 23/08/17 09:29, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote: It fails also with fresh git pull: Checking 'grep'... ok. Checking 'getopt'... ok. Checking 'stat'... ok. Checking 'unzip'... ok. Checking 'bzip2'... ok. Checking 'wget'... ok. Checking 'perl'... ok. Checking 'python'...

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/2] toolchain: gcc: drop MIPS patch

On 23/08/17 09:20, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2017-08-22 12:01, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: Drop 300-mips_Os_cpu_rtx_cost_model.patch for gcc 7.2 This was causing mis-compilation of dropbear with the default '-Os' size optimization as reported in FS#814 Tested on ar71xx, archer C7 v2. For

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Issues with xtables-addons after rebasing today

It fails also with fresh git pull: Checking 'grep'... ok. Checking 'getopt'... ok. Checking 'stat'... ok. Checking 'unzip'... ok. Checking 'bzip2'... ok. Checking 'wget'... ok. Checking 'perl'... ok. Checking 'python'... ok. Checking 'git'... ok. Checking 'file'... ok. Checking

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Issues with ncurses (Was: Issues with xtables-addons after rebasing today)

On 23-08-17, Koen Vandeputte wrote: > Now this one pops up again (reported by Mauro Mozzarelli yesterday): > > > find > /mnt/ramdisk/test/firmware/builds/generic_imx6/build_dir/target-arm_cortex-a9+neon_musl_eabi/util-linux-2.30.1/ipkg-arm_cortex-a9_neon/dmesg > -name 'CVS' -o -name '.svn' -o

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Issues with xtables-addons after rebasing today

pushed a fix, please retest John ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Issues with ncurses (Was: Issues with xtables-addons after rebasing today)

Will this be fixed so that a normal git pull will no longer fail? On 23/08/17 10:12, Koen Vandeputte wrote: On 2017-08-23 10:39, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: On 23-08-17, Koen Vandeputte wrote: Now this one pops up again (reported by Mauro Mozzarelli yesterday): find

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Issues with ncurses (Was: Issues with xtables-addons after rebasing today)

On 2017-08-23 13:32, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote: Will this be fixed so that a normal git pull will no longer fail? It already has been since this morning: commit: "4fce22e util-linux: add missing dependencies" Koen ___ Lede-dev mailing list

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/2] toolchain: gcc: drop MIPS patch

On 23/08/17 09:20, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2017-08-22 12:01, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: Drop 300-mips_Os_cpu_rtx_cost_model.patch for gcc 7.2 This was causing mis-compilation of dropbear with the default '-Os' size optimization as reported in FS#814 Tested on ar71xx, archer C7 v2. For

Re: [LEDE-DEV] busybox ntpd not syncing if any server is bad

On 21.08.2017 16:34, Karl Palsson wrote: on master, even with the ntpd patch for busybox applied. # ntpdate -q localhost server ::1, stratum 0, offset 0.00, delay 0.0 server 127.0.0.1, stratum 0, offset 0.00, delay 0.0 21 Aug 14:26:24 ntpdate[1392]: no server suitable for

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] Survey on the usage of OpenWrt/LEDE

Shelly Coen writes: > Hi Everyone, > > The prplWrt Working Group has compiled a survey on the subject of how > OpenWrt/LEDE is used. > > We would really appreciate if you could take some time to complete this short > survey to help give us a valuable oversight of

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/2] toolchain: gcc: drop MIPS patch

Citeren Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant : On 23/08/17 09:20, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2017-08-22 12:01, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: Drop 300-mips_Os_cpu_rtx_cost_model.patch for gcc 7.2 This was causing mis-compilation of dropbear with the default '-Os' size

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] ipq806x: Archer C2600: fix switch ports numbering

From: Baptiste Jonglez The order of LAN ports shown in Luci is reversed compared to what is written on the case of the device. Fix the order so that they match. Signed-off-by: Baptiste Jonglez --- This patch applies cleanly to the lede-17.01

[LEDE-DEV] ipv6 configuration

What is the expected behaviour if an ip6hint is given, which is too long for a prefix? e.g. prefix delegation gives a prefix of 2003:::zz00::/56 and ip6hint is . Currently, isn't given, because it is too long. Will it be a better approach, to shrink the ip6hint value for the