Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 13/13] sunxi: Add A64 support with cortex53 subtarget

On 23-10-17, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > Could you try an image build the sunxi branch of my staging tree please: > https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/hauke/staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/sunxi > > I backproted the MMC driver in there as it got some patches which are > probably needed for the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 9/9] ar71xx: add support for Comfast E214N V2 Outdoor CPE

Hi, Piotr Dymacz wrote: Hello Zoltan, On 22.10.2017 22:21, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: Based on Robert Budde's patch, with additional reworks. https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/390 Signed-off-by: Zoltan HERPAI --- [snip] We have some COMFAST devices already supported under

[LEDE-DEV] merge: add OpenWrt branding

Given that we've decided to sail under the same flag for the benefit of the whole community, and acknowledge the achievements of the LEDE project, let's start the final steps of the merge. The git and other sources are untouched until the infra merge. Signed-off-by: Zoltan HERPAI

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] merge: add OpenWrt branding

On 24 October 2017 at 19:46, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > Given that we've decided to sail under the same flag for > the benefit of the whole community, and acknowledge the > achievements of the LEDE project, let's start the final > steps of the merge. > > The git and other sources are

Re: [LEDE-DEV] merge: add OpenWrt branding

Hi, comments inline. > Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz Given the fact that we explicitely wanted to avoid @openwrt.org mails and that this was one of the discussion points leading to the split I find it delicate to seal the merging commit with exactly such a S-o-b. Combined with

Re: [LEDE-DEV] uhttpd problems with env variable in cgi

On 2017-10-22 14:19, p.wa...@gmx.at wrote: > Hi Karl, > >> There's really been very few commits to uhttpd, it shouldn't be >> hard to bisect to the specific one that causes this. > > Ok, I tracked it down to 88c0b4b6d00152c54a0f1367ae839c71547281e1 commited > by Jo-Philipp. Before that commit,

Re: [LEDE-DEV] uhttpd problems with env variable in cgi

Hi, I think the issue is me reusing the global "uh_buf" in uh_auth_check(). The same buffer is used to store the URL pieces referred to be the "path_info" struct. Will look into a fix for that. ~ Jo ___ Lede-dev mailing list

Re: [LEDE-DEV] merge: add OpenWrt branding

Hi Jo, On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: Hi, comments inline. Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz Given the fact that we explicitely wanted to avoid @openwrt.org mails and that this was one of the discussion points leading to the split I find it delicate to seal the

[LEDE-DEV] Lede/Openwrt documentation

Hello, I have been reviewing email on the archive about what will happen with openwrt/lede documentation on the remerge, and I couldn't reach any conclusion. Would mind anyone clarifying? Cheers, Javier ___ Lede-dev mailing list

Re: [LEDE-DEV] merge: add OpenWrt branding

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 03:07:04PM +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi, > > comments inline. > > > Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz > > Given the fact that we explicitely wanted to avoid @openwrt.org mails > and that this was one of the discussion points leading to the split I >

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/2] uqmi: replace legacy command invoke with newer type

Signed-off-by: Koen Vandeputte --- Verified using online shell checker package/network/utils/uqmi/files/lib/netifd/proto/qmi.sh | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [LEDE-DEV] merge: add OpenWrt branding

Hi Hannu, On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, Hannu Nyman wrote: Zoltan HERPAI kirjoitti 24.10.2017 klo 14:46: Given that we've decided to sail under the same flag for the benefit of the whole community, and acknowledge the achievements of the LEDE project, let's start the final steps of the merge. The

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] merge: add OpenWrt branding

Hello Zoltan, Hauke, Just one, small comment, inline below. On 24.10.2017 13:46, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: [...] diff --git a/include/image-commands.mk b/include/image-commands.mk index aaece70..3507578 100644 --- a/include/image-commands.mk +++ b/include/image-commands.mk @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ define

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Lede/Openwrt documentation

On 24/10/2017 18:02, Javier Domingo Cansino wrote: Hello, I have been reviewing email on the archive about what will happen with openwrt/lede documentation on the remerge, and I couldn't reach any conclusion. Would mind anyone clarifying? Cheers, Javier

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] merge: add OpenWrt branding

2017-10-24 16:59 GMT+02:00 Zoltan HERPAI : > Hi Jo, > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> comments inline. >> >>> Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz >> >> >> Given the fact that we explicitely wanted to avoid @openwrt.org mails >> and that this

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] merge: add OpenWrt branding

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Mathias Kresin wrote: > 2017-10-24 16:59 GMT+02:00 Zoltan HERPAI : >> Hi Jo, >> >> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> comments inline. >>> Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz >>> >>> >>>

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Lede/Openwrt documentation

> Depends on the direction we will be moving, see above. If I can give my opinion, having little training on openwrt-lede code base specifics, I find the LEDE docs better organized. My contributions were around 2 years ago, and focused on documenting the libs that are used in the core of

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] merge: add OpenWrt branding

On 10/24/2017 09:47 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Mathias Kresin wrote: >> 2017-10-24 16:59 GMT+02:00 Zoltan HERPAI : >>> Hi Jo, >>> >>> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >>> Hi, comments inline. >

Re: [LEDE-DEV] meetup for beer in Prague

On 10/23/2017 12:55 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 10/19/2017 10:18 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> On 10/18/2017 08:58 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have ELCE and the OpenWrt summit next week in Prague and a lot of >>> people will be there. >>> >>> I would like to have a meeting next

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] merge: add OpenWrt branding

Hi Hauke, On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 10/24/2017 09:47 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Mathias Kresin wrote: 2017-10-24 16:59 GMT+02:00 Zoltan HERPAI : Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz Given the

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 3/3] hostapd: bump PKG_RELEASE

Increase PKG_RELEASE after latest changes to hostapd, so downstream users can fetch updates via opkg. Signed-off-by: Timo Sigurdsson --- package/network/services/hostapd/Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 0/3] hostapd: Address some limitations of wpa_disable_eapol_key_retries

Hi, in a discussion on the hostap mailing list about the limitations of the new hostapd parameter wpa_disable_eapol_key_retries as an AP side workaround for the Key Reinstallation Attacks (KRACK), two corner cases were mentioned along with suggestions how to address them [1][2]. The changes are

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/3] hostapd: Expose the tdls_prohibit option to UCI

wpa_disable_eapol_key_retries can't prevent attacks against the Tunneled Direct-Link Setup (TDLS) handshake. Jouni Malinen suggested that the existing hostapd option tdls_prohibit can be used to further complicate this possibility at the AP side. tdls_prohibit=1 makes hostapd advertise that use of

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/3] hostapd: Backport Ignore WNM-Sleep Mode Request in wnm_sleep_mode=0 case

wpa_disable_eapol_key_retries can't prevent attacks against the Wireless Network Management (WNM) Sleep Mode handshake. Currently, hostapd processes WNM Sleep Mode requests from clients regardless of the setting wnm_sleep_mode. Backport Jouni Malinen's upstream patch 114f2830 in order to ignore

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] merge: add OpenWrt branding

> Op 25 okt. 2017, om 00:21 heeft Zoltan HERPAI het volgende > geschreven: > > Hi Hauke, > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > >> On 10/24/2017 09:47 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Mathias Kresin wrote:

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Lede/Openwrt documentation

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Lede-dev [mailto:lede-dev-boun...@lists.infradead.org] Im Auftrag > von John Norton > Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2017 18:20 > An: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > Betreff: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Lede/Openwrt documentation > > > > On 24/10/2017 18:02, Javier