Re: [LEDE-DEV] 18.06 Status?

Hi all, I feel like everybody is just waiting for everybody to agree what features we want in before coming up with the next step of picking a date. Obviously this isn't working out very well. Why not turn things around? Pick a date in a few weeks time on which the Master branch will be split to

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] Gemini forward-port to kernel v4.14

On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:49 PM, Linus Walleij > wrote: >> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Roman Yeryomin wrote: >> The GPIO LEDs does not come up though?

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] brcm2708: add squashfs rootfs image

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Golle wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 07:42:18PM +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote: This patch adds a image with squashfs as the root filesystem. A rootfs_data partition will be generated on the first boot and placed inside the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] Gemini forward-port to kernel v4.14

On 05/05/2018 11:25 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:49 PM, Linus Walleij > wrote: >> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Roman Yeryomin wrote: >> The GPIO LEDs does not come up though? CONFIG_LEDS_GPIO is not in config, and

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2 00/10] at91 patch series

On 05/04/2018 07:27 PM, Sandeep Sheriker Mallikarjun wrote: > resending all patches again due with rebase. > > Sandeep Sheriker Mallikarjun (10): > at91bootstrap:update to v3.8.10 > at91: fix sdcard create image > uboot-at91: fetch uboot src from u-boot-at91 github > kernel: fix build

[LEDE-DEV] Firewall restart crashes routers with kernel 4.14

Hello, When restarting the firewall on routers running latest nightly, I frequently get the following warning: [ 74.952854] [ cut here ] [ 74.952874] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_rtcache.c:197 0x8f6293f0 [ 74.952876] Modules linked in:

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] Gemini forward-port to kernel v4.14

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:49 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Roman Yeryomin wrote: > >>> The GPIO LEDs does not come up though? >>> CONFIG_LEDS_GPIO is not in config, and >>> /sys/class/leds is empty. >>> >>> Does it need a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC PATCH] tools/squashfs: change to upstream and update to new version 5.0-rc1

Are there any updates on this issue? I'd really like to see squasfs 5.0 used in OpenWrt! On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 05/26/2017 06:13 PM, Alexander Couzens wrote: squashfs is quite long unmaintained. All patches from major distributions are

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] kernel: bump kernel 4.4 to 4.4.131 for 17.01

* Refreshed patches Compile-tested: ar71xx Run-tested: ar71xx Signed-off-by: Etienne Haarsma --- include/kernel-version.mk| 4 ++-- ...03-mtd_fix_cfi_cmdset_0002_status_check.patch | 14 +++---

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] Gemini forward-port to kernel v4.14

On 2018-05-05 17:32, Linus Walleij wrote: On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Roman Yeryomin wrote: Linus, if you have time, could you check if this helps to bring network up on dir-685? https://github.com/yeryomin/openwrt/commit/b0296b1f71bd3d677c931addd6de341203fbf18f Sadly

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] Gemini forward-port to kernel v4.14

On 2018-05-05 16:35, Linus Walleij wrote: On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:49 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Roman Yeryomin wrote: The GPIO LEDs

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Firewall restart crashes routers with kernel 4.14

On 05.05.2018 15:56, Kristian Evensen wrote: Hello, When restarting the firewall on routers running latest nightly, I frequently get the following warning: [ 74.952854] [ cut here ] [ 74.952874] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_rtcache.c:197

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC PATCH] tools/squashfs: change to upstream and update to new version 5.0-rc1

Me too. > On May 5, 2018, at 7:36 AM, Paul Spooren wrote: > > Are there any updates on this issue? I'd really like to see squasfs 5.0 used > in OpenWrt! > > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> On 05/26/2017 06:13 PM, Alexander Couzens

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] brcm47xx: switch to the kernel 4.14

From: Rafał Miłecki The biggest (and the only?) disadventage of this is obviously an increased image size. For mips74k the size of vmlinux goes up from 4186684 B to 4701436 B. Most devices use LZMA compressed kernel so probably more important is vmlinux.lzma size which goes up

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] Gemini forward-port to kernel v4.14

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Roman Yeryomin wrote: > Linus, if you have time, could you check if this helps to bring network up > on dir-685? > https://github.com/yeryomin/openwrt/commit/b0296b1f71bd3d677c931addd6de341203fbf18f Sadly not. At least not outofthebox. I do not

Re: [LEDE-DEV] 18.06 Status?

On 05/05/18 12:27, Jaap Buurman wrote: Hi all, I feel like everybody is just waiting for everybody to agree what features we want in before coming up with the next step of picking a date. Obviously this isn't working out very well. Why not turn things around? Pick a date in a few weeks time

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [OpenWrt-Devel] 18.06 Status?

> One characteristic from OpenWrt, different from other projects is the > lack of a leader or a person who can gather others together, make some > decisions or push for them to happen. If one doesn't like this title it > can also be "Project Manager" or "Project Coordinator". This, in my > view,

Re: [LEDE-DEV] ipq40xx cpu frequency

Hello, On Friday, May 4, 2018 4:12:16 PM CEST Roman Yeryomin wrote: > I'm seeing this > > [1.275858] cpufreq: cpufreq_online: CPU0: Running at unlisted freq: > 632000 KHz > [1.276620] cpufreq: cpufreq_online: CPU0: Unlisted initial frequency > changed to: 716000 KHz Sorry, but I'm

Re: [LEDE-DEV] 18.06 Status?

One characteristic from OpenWrt, different from other projects is the lack of a leader or a person who can gather others together, make some decisions or push for them to happen. If one doesn't like this title it can also be "Project Manager" or "Project Coordinator". This, in my view, makes a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] 18.06 Status?

This isn't a job where you can force people to do anything. Also, I'm not a fan of half-assing or leaving out things for the sake of a schedule. -Alberto On 05/05/2018 20:41, Fernando Frediani wrote: One characteristic from OpenWrt, different from other projects is the lack of a leader or

Re: [LEDE-DEV] 18.06 Status?

I didn't mention forcing people at any point. Just having someone to be in charge in order to organize certain things, get people's availability and make more thing happen. With regards schedule the lack of one seems not doing much good, so having one has the potential to improve things. And