On Sunday, September 18, 2016 2:19:33 PM CEST John Crispin wrote:
> On 18/09/2016 14:17, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 2:01 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> >> On 08/09/2016 23:58, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> >>> So yes, if it needs to go in a different location, that would be f
On 18/09/2016 14:17, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 2:01 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/09/2016 23:58, Christian Lamparter wrote:
>>> So yes, if it needs to go in a different location, that would be fine.
>>> Based on your suggestion, I think the owl-loader.c code c
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 2:01 PM, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 08/09/2016 23:58, Christian Lamparter wrote:
>> So yes, if it needs to go in a different location, that would be fine.
>> Based on your suggestion, I think the owl-loader.c code can be moved to:
>> target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net
On 08/09/2016 23:58, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> So yes, if it needs to go in a different location, that would be fine.
> Based on your suggestion, I think the owl-loader.c code can be moved to:
> target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/owl-loader.c
>
> and the module definition f
On 10/09/2016 11:24, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Christian Lamparter
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thursday, September 8, 2016 9:34:07 AM CEST John Crispin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> why is this code located under package/ and not as a kernel patch under
>>> target/li
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Christian Lamparter
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thursday, September 8, 2016 9:34:07 AM CEST John Crispin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> why is this code located under package/ and not as a kernel patch under
>> target/linux/generic ?
could you please explain why you would prefer t
Hello,
On Thursday, September 8, 2016 9:34:07 AM CEST John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> why is this code located under package/ and not as a kernel patch under
> target/linux/generic ?
well, there isn't a good reason. In fact, it started as a copy of
gpio-button-hotplug's skeleton and evolved it fro
Hi,
why is this code located under package/ and not as a kernel patch under
target/linux/generic ?
John
On 05/09/2016 06:59, Chris Blake wrote:
> From: Christian Lamparter
>
> Some devices (like the Cisco Meraki Z1 Cloud Managed Teleworker Gateway)
> need to be able to initialize the