Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/3] kernel: owl-loader for delayed Atheros ath9k fixup

2016-09-18 Thread Christian Lamparter
On Sunday, September 18, 2016 2:19:33 PM CEST John Crispin wrote: > On 18/09/2016 14:17, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 2:01 PM, John Crispin wrote: > >> On 08/09/2016 23:58, Christian Lamparter wrote: > >>> So yes, if it needs to go in a different location, that would be f

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/3] kernel: owl-loader for delayed Atheros ath9k fixup

2016-09-18 Thread John Crispin
On 18/09/2016 14:17, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 2:01 PM, John Crispin wrote: >> >> >> On 08/09/2016 23:58, Christian Lamparter wrote: >>> So yes, if it needs to go in a different location, that would be fine. >>> Based on your suggestion, I think the owl-loader.c code c

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/3] kernel: owl-loader for delayed Atheros ath9k fixup

2016-09-18 Thread Martin Blumenstingl
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 2:01 PM, John Crispin wrote: > > > On 08/09/2016 23:58, Christian Lamparter wrote: >> So yes, if it needs to go in a different location, that would be fine. >> Based on your suggestion, I think the owl-loader.c code can be moved to: >> target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/3] kernel: owl-loader for delayed Atheros ath9k fixup

2016-09-18 Thread John Crispin
On 08/09/2016 23:58, Christian Lamparter wrote: > So yes, if it needs to go in a different location, that would be fine. > Based on your suggestion, I think the owl-loader.c code can be moved to: > target/linux/generic/files/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/owl-loader.c > > and the module definition f

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/3] kernel: owl-loader for delayed Atheros ath9k fixup

2016-09-10 Thread John Crispin
On 10/09/2016 11:24, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Christian Lamparter > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Thursday, September 8, 2016 9:34:07 AM CEST John Crispin wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> why is this code located under package/ and not as a kernel patch under >>> target/li

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/3] kernel: owl-loader for delayed Atheros ath9k fixup

2016-09-10 Thread Martin Blumenstingl
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Christian Lamparter wrote: > Hello, > > On Thursday, September 8, 2016 9:34:07 AM CEST John Crispin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> why is this code located under package/ and not as a kernel patch under >> target/linux/generic ? could you please explain why you would prefer t

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/3] kernel: owl-loader for delayed Atheros ath9k fixup

2016-09-08 Thread Christian Lamparter
Hello, On Thursday, September 8, 2016 9:34:07 AM CEST John Crispin wrote: > Hi, > > why is this code located under package/ and not as a kernel patch under > target/linux/generic ? well, there isn't a good reason. In fact, it started as a copy of gpio-button-hotplug's skeleton and evolved it fro

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/3] kernel: owl-loader for delayed Atheros ath9k fixup

2016-09-08 Thread John Crispin
Hi, why is this code located under package/ and not as a kernel patch under target/linux/generic ? John On 05/09/2016 06:59, Chris Blake wrote: > From: Christian Lamparter > > Some devices (like the Cisco Meraki Z1 Cloud Managed Teleworker Gateway) > need to be able to initialize the