Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC 0/1] x86: Add support for the PC Engines APU2 Board

2016-10-22 Thread Dave Taht
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Ben Greear wrote: > > > On 10/16/2016 08:30 AM, STR . wrote: >>> >>> BQL + fq_codel kills bufferbloat at line rate (10,100,1000mbit) on >>> ethernet cards. It also works if you have hardware flow control on the the >>> ethernet. >>> It

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC 0/1] x86: Add support for the PC Engines APU2 Board

2016-10-16 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 10/16/2016 05:30 PM, STR . wrote: >> I'd rather like to see the bcp38 stuff a default, but although we made the >> code work right for one layer of nat, too many people have more than that. :( > Double NAT? > Common for fibre providers, and 3G/4G, where the "modem" isn't a modem but a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC 0/1] x86: Add support for the PC Engines APU2 Board

2016-10-16 Thread Ben Greear
On 10/16/2016 08:30 AM, STR . wrote: BQL + fq_codel kills bufferbloat at line rate (10,100,1000mbit) on ethernet cards. It also works if you have hardware flow control on the the ethernet. It can't do anything on downloads. If your connection is not at line rate or the download is

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC 0/1] x86: Add support for the PC Engines APU2 Board

2016-10-16 Thread STR .
> BQL + fq_codel kills bufferbloat at line rate (10,100,1000mbit) on ethernet > cards. It also works if you have hardware flow control on the the ethernet. > It can't do anything on downloads. > If your connection is not at line rate or the download is overbuffered > (looks like 20Mbit here),

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC 0/1] x86: Add support for the PC Engines APU2 Board

2016-10-16 Thread Dave Taht
Everything important in CeroWrt long ago made it upstream - the apu2 (which, btw, I have been using as my main test platform for the make-wifi-fast work) has BQL on the intel network drivers, already, fq_codel is the default in lede, sch_cake is available as an optional package, and the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC 0/1] x86: Add support for the PC Engines APU2 Board

2016-10-16 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 10/16/2016 11:49 AM, STR . wrote: > Could we also build 'lsusb' along with lspci? I'd recommend bundling the > usb-serial-kmod too as a lot of mini-pci devices present themselves as USB. Yes to this. Many 3G/4G modems on mini-pcie port are using usb lines of mini-pcie port and not pcie

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC 0/1] x86: Add support for the PC Engines APU2 Board

2016-10-14 Thread Ben Greear
On 10/14/2016 10:19 AM, Chris Blake wrote: This is an RFC to port the PC Engines APU2 board to LEDE. Currently this is based on my unofficial repo at https://github.com/riptidewave93/LEDE-APU2 and after a discussion on the lede-dev IRC on the best plan of action, which was to move this device

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [RFC 0/1] x86: Add support for the PC Engines APU2 Board

2016-10-14 Thread Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
Chris, You might be interested in https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2015-February/031200.html, which was never commited. Regards, --- Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca, Me. luizl...@gmail.com ___ Lede-dev mailing list