Ah, good to know. Thank you!
On Friday, January 4, 2019 at 8:03:42 PM UTC-6, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> * Martin Michlmayr > [2019-01-05 00:01]:
> > * Scott Carpenter > [2019-01-04
> 17:35]:
> > > Tried to glom a whole bunch of accounts together for a query, but
> appears
> > > there is a 25
* Martin Michlmayr [2019-01-05 00:01]:
> * Scott Carpenter [2019-01-04 17:35]:
> > Tried to glom a whole bunch of accounts together for a query, but appears
> > there is a 256 character limit for the // grouping, e.g.:
> >
> > While parsing value expression:
> > (cleared)&((account =~ /^(fu:
* Scott Carpenter [2019-01-04 17:35]:
> Tried to glom a whole bunch of accounts together for a query, but appears
> there is a 256 character limit for the // grouping, e.g.:
>
> While parsing value expression:
> (cleared)&((account =~ /^(fu: bar|...lots of chars...|abc: def)$/))
>
I do have them grouped in a tree structure, but was still querying all
accounts separately for reasons. My ledgerbil reconciler caches previous
balances which should match ledger's --cleared totals. I initially wanted
to explicitly query by the cached account names, but realize now it will
work
Never hit that limit! Can you group your accounts in a tree structure?
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 18:35 Scott Carpenter wrote:
> Tried to glom a whole bunch of accounts together for a query, but appears
> there is a 256 character limit for the // grouping, e.g.:
>
> While parsing value expression:
Tried to glom a whole bunch of accounts together for a query, but appears
there is a 256 character limit for the // grouping, e.g.:
While parsing value expression:
(cleared)&((account =~ /^(fu: bar|...lots of chars...|abc: def)$/))
Error
