Re: [DOCS] Arguments to the payees and accounts commands

Craig Earls enderw88-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org writes: I figured out that ledger requires the @ even when used with the payees command. So,  ledger payees Som.*dy  returns all payees the required syntax is ledger payees @Som.*dy returns Somebody Ah, hmm... There is

Re: [DOCS] Arguments to the payees and accounts commands

I have added the @ requirement to the docs. I agree that this is not a bug. On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 14:29, John Wiegley jwieg...@gmail.com wrote: Craig Earls enderw88-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org writes: I figured out that ledger requires the @ even when used with the payees

Re: [DOCS] Arguments to the payees and accounts commands

I figured out that ledger requires the @ even when used with the payees command. So, ledger payees Som.*dy returns all payees the required syntax is ledger payees @Som.*dy returns Somebody It would be interesting, and I suspect already in the code to be able to see a payees or accounts

[DOCS] Arguments to the payees and accounts commands

I was playing around with the payees command and it appear to not accept any argument. REGEXes after the command seem to have no effect. Is this expected? The accounts command behaves as I expected allowing regexes to control output Is there a way to tell ledger to output the number of