Re: --empty and its behaviour at the period limits

2015-03-20 Thread santaphile
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 8:25:39 PM UTC+1, John Wiegley wrote: I would expect this too. Can you please enter a bug at http://bugs.ledger-cli.org? Done: http://bugs.ledger-cli.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1115 -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: --empty and its behaviour at the period limits

2015-03-20 Thread santaphile
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 11:23:33 PM UTC+1, Simon Michael (sm) wrote: Yes I should have made clear, I know you asked about ledger and I'm just confirming your observation and sharing ideas for improvement. hledger initially did it just like ledger and I had exactly the same wish as

Re: --empty and its behaviour at the period limits

2015-03-19 Thread Simon Michael
On 3/19/15 5:32 AM, santaph...@gmail.com wrote: When start/end dates have been specified (with -b/-e/-p/date:), hledger will extend the report to those dates when -E/--empty is used. Eg: 2014/7/1 (Expenses:RareExpense) 1 $ hledger reg -ME -b 2014/1/1 RareExpense 2014/01

Re: --empty and its behaviour at the period limits

2015-03-19 Thread John Wiegley
santaphile santaph...@gmail.com writes: I can understand why ledger has this behaviour if no start or end-date is present. However, I don't find it sensible that the above does not contain the empty months until from January till July. I would expect exactly the behaviour that hledger seems

Re: --empty and its behaviour at the period limits

2015-03-02 Thread Simon Michael
On 3/1/15 3:42 AM, santaph...@gmail.com wrote: Running ledger -M --empty reg ^Expenses:RareExpense produces a summary of Expenses:RareExpense, where each month is represented, even if there was no activity for a given month. The behaviour of --empty with regards to the beginning