On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 07:09:25PM +0100, Juergen Daubert wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:23:59AM +0100, Juergen Daubert wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 04:54:38AM -0400, John Wiegley wrote:
Now begins the documenting and further testing stage for 3.0. If
you have any bugs to
On Nov 1, 2009, at 4:21 AM, Juergen Daubert wrote:
Would be nice to have more meaningful error message like
'corrupted cache file' or maybe a warning that the file is
for 2.6 and cannot be used by 3.0 here.
Ok, this has been fixed. I'm afraid the caching feature needs a lot
more testing.
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 04:54:38AM -0400, John Wiegley wrote:
Now begins the documenting and further testing stage for 3.0. If
you have any bugs to submit, please do so now! so that I can get
everything into 3.0 that should be.
Thanks, John
Got the following error:
./ledger -f
What is the approved way to get the latest version? ./acprep pull give
me
checking build system type... Invalid configuration `pull': machine
`pull' not recognized
I've been using git pull but don't know if this works well with acprep
On Oct 31, 8:54 am, John Wiegley jwieg...@gmail.com wrote:
A big milestone - congrats John!
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:23:59AM +0100, Juergen Daubert wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 04:54:38AM -0400, John Wiegley wrote:
Now begins the documenting and further testing stage for 3.0. If
you have any bugs to submit, please do so now! so that I can get
everything into 3.0 that
Excellent work!
I'm not sure if this is a bug or a lack of a feature, but I would
love to see the period flag (-p) accept /MM. The sample file
only has entries from 'May 2004', but using -p to request entries from
'April 2004' still shows the ones from May.
vi...@ike:~/dev/ledger$ ./ledger
On Oct 31, 2009, at 6:30 AM, ed wrote:
What is the approved way to get the latest version? ./acprep pull give
me
checking build system type... Invalid configuration `pull': machine
`pull' not recognized
I've been using git pull but don't know if this works well with acprep
The best way to
On Oct 31, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kurup wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a bug or a lack of a feature, but I would
love to see the period flag (-p) accept /MM. The sample file
only has entries from 'May 2004', but using -p to request entries from
'April 2004' still shows the ones from May.
