> "CM" == Cassie McCarthy <759...@gmail.com> writes:
CM> Is this possible to do still? I know I'm 10 years late but I am also
CM> having this issue.
I don't think anything has changed with time reporting since then. :(
John
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Is this possible to do still? I know I'm 10 years late but I am also having
this issue.
On Monday, June 20, 2011 at 3:11:04 AM UTC-4 John Wiegley wrote:
> Seppo Sade writes:
>
> > Currently timeclock entries result in a virtual transaction were the
> > time is just added to that account. But I
Seppo Sade sepposa...@gmail.com writes:
Currently timeclock entries result in a virtual transaction were the
time is just added to that account. But I would instead like to make
it a balanced transaction, with both a source and destination account.
Any hints on how to accomplish this?
This
Is there any way to make transactions generated from timeclock entries
be balanced (in preferably ledger 2.6), given some source account?
Currently timeclock entries result in a virtual transaction were the
time is just added to that account. But I would instead like to make
it a balanced
