Re: Ledger 3.1.1 release candidate

Hello Bruce, thank you for the report! > 92% tests passed, 28 tests failed out of 353 Not too bad, yet there seems to be room improvement :) > The python support is broken (running ledger python gives a segfault) so > I'm not surprised by the _py test failures Which Python version do you use?

Re: Ledger 3.1.1 release candidate

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Alexis wrote: > Hello Bruce, > thank you for the report! > > > 92% tests passed, 28 tests failed out of 353 > > Not too bad, yet there seems to be room improvement :) > > > The python support is broken (running ledger python gives a

Re: Ledger 3.1.1 release candidate

I got the following test results on cygwin: $ make test ... 92% tests passed, 28 tests failed out of 353 Total Test time (real) = 145.29 sec The following tests FAILED: 29 - BaselineTest_cmd-pricedb (Failed) 31 - BaselineTest_cmd-prices (Failed) 48 -

Ledger 3.1.1 release candidate

Hi everyone, ledger has seen several improvements and lately also some bitrot (especially with newer boost version, namely 1.58 and 1.59). So I think a new release is in order. I pushed the latest changes to the next and the release/3.1.1 branch and kindly ask that anyone willing to spend some

Re: Ledger 3.1.1 release candidate

> Alexis writes: > I pushed the latest changes to the next and the release/3.1.1 branch and > kindly ask that anyone willing to spend some time and effort test those > changes and report any issues. Thank you, Alexis! John -- --- You received this message because