Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Feedback on new customer/vendor proposal

2006-11-08 Thread Ed W
Hi > I want to make the current customer/vendor/shipto structure go away > for 1.3. It would be replaced by: > Sounds excellent. Just a few thoughts: - In general I only *buy* from my suppliers and only *sell* to my customers. ie for 95% of my contact base there is a clear distinction as

[Ledger-smb-devel] Request for feedback on proposal for role management

2006-11-08 Thread Chris Travers
Hi all; As we get close to 1.2, I am revisting areas that I am considering for 1.3 and requesting feedback to make sure that they will really meet the needs of the userbase. I have done a lot of work on role management in another program that I can move over if it works for people. The general f

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Feedback on new customer/vendor proposal

2006-11-08 Thread Chris Travers
That part is actually currently supported by the db structure, though we may do some revisions in the future. It is just a UI change. And it should be possible to do this in a generally applicable way, I would think. On 11/8/06, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-08 at

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Feedback on new customer/vendor proposal

2006-11-08 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 12:11 -0500, Jason Rodrigues wrote: > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:36, Chris Travers wrote: > > 2) Companies would have contacts which would be designated as > > billing, shipto, or misc. Contacts would have relevant contact > > information (name, address, phone, email,

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Feedback on new customer/vendor proposal

2006-11-08 Thread Jason Rodrigues
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 12:28, Chris Travers wrote: > > not necessarily a physical address, but "Quantum View Notification" email > > addresses, etc. (Something UPS offers) > > Can you go into this Quantum View Notification thing in a bit more detail? When you send the shipping details to U

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Feedback on new customer/vendor proposal

2006-11-08 Thread Chris Travers
On 11/8/06, Jason Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:36, Chris Travers wrote: > > 2) Companies would have contacts which would be designated as > > billing, shipto, or misc. Contacts would have relevant contact > > information (name, address, phone, email, etc

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Feedback on new customer/vendor proposal

2006-11-08 Thread Jason Rodrigues
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:36, Chris Travers wrote: > 2) Companies would have contacts which would be designated as > billing, shipto, or misc. Contacts would have relevant contact > information (name, address, phone, email, etc). Billing and shipto > contact types would have a primary or

[Ledger-smb-devel] Feedback on new customer/vendor proposal

2006-11-08 Thread Chris Travers
Hi all; This is sort of my final draft on this matter. I have incorporated a lot of feedback from other people on it. Just making sure there isn't anything I have missed. I want to make the current customer/vendor/shipto structure go away for 1.3. It would be replaced by: 1) Companies (custo