Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Budget add-on

2011-10-29 Thread Chris Travers
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Chris Travers > wrote: >> Hi; >> For those who are wondering, the budget add-on now is minimally feature >> complete.  I'd still like to add notes attachments soon, and I haven't set >> up th

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Budget add-on

2011-10-29 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Chris, On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Chris Travers wrote: > Hi; > For those who are wondering, the budget add-on now is minimally feature > complete.  I'd still like to add notes attachments soon, and I haven't set > up the menu yet. Congrats! Is the add-on ready enough to create a a tar

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for 1.3.x series db updates

2011-10-29 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Chris, Although this is in the 1.3.3 RC1 tarball already, I'll give you my reaction nonetheless. > My thinking is to make all db updates which occur only in the types or > functions of the database be handled by simply doing a module reload. > This means dropping types if they exist, old versi

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal: Web Services API

2011-10-29 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi John, > Erik and I were just chatting on IRC about web services. I recently > updated our in-house management system to generate new invoices in LSMB, > and it's a pain in the butt to do -- the current process looks like this: [...] > At Freelock, we do a substantial amount of web services wo

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger-smb-devel Digest, Vol 58, Issue 21

2011-10-29 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Hugh, Thanks for your response pointing us to existing work - and for starting this work. I saw your work is from 2009. Did you work against 1.3 in a newer (maybe unpublished) version? > Yes, that would be me, please. > Two some years ago I did some preliminary work on: > http://search.cpan.o