On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Nigel Titley wrote:
> On 10/01/12 22:02, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
>> Hi Nigel,
>
>>> I'm about to add a header at the start, dump a new test copy of the
>>> database and try again.
>>
>> That should do it. Please let us know about your outcome.
>
> OK, I'm now getting
On 10/01/12 22:02, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> Hi Nigel,
>> I'm about to add a header at the start, dump a new test copy of the
>> database and try again.
>
> That should do it. Please let us know about your outcome.
OK, I'm now getting a little further on
psql:1.2-1.3-upgrade.sql:38: ERROR: null
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 03:54 -0500, Chris Travers wrote:
> Let's go ahead and get something in the tracker on this right away.
As initial examples of what I'm talking about, I've added the
following 'Documentation Requests' type tracker items: 3472011,
3472015, & 3472019. They also include exa
Hi Nigel,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Nigel Titley wrote:
> On 09/01/12 20:11, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
>> Hi Nigel,
>>
>> Many thanks... I'll work through and find out which account is causing
>> the problem.
>>
> Hmm, this fails at the first fence, with offset 0. I think its
On 09/01/12 20:11, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> Hi Nigel,
>
> Many thanks... I'll work through and find out which account is causing
> the problem.
>
Hmm, this fails at the first fence, with offset 0. I think its a more
fundamental error with the "account_save" procedure.
>>>
On 09/01/2012 19:49, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> Hi Nigel,
>
Many thanks... I'll work through and find out which account is causing
the problem.
>>> Hmm, this fails at the first fence, with offset 0. I think its a more
>>> fundamental error with the "account_save" procedure.
>>>
>> I'm s
On 10/01/2012 09:08, Chris Travers wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. I have been on vacation.
Really no problem, hope you had a good time.
>
> No doesn't seem to have made any difference. Still the same error
>
> psql:/tmp/ledgersmb/1.2-1.3-upgrade.sql:30: ERROR: null value in column
> "heading" viol
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 03:54 -0500, Chris Travers wrote:
> Let's go ahead and get something in the tracker on this right away.
I'll start working on that.
> Most likely the problem is actually that I might not quite know how
> the NAME is supposed to work. Feedback would be helpful there.
Sorry for the delay. I have been on vacation.
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Nigel Titley wrote:
> On 31/12/11 15:40, Nigel Titley wrote:
>> On 31/12/11 11:26, Nigel Titley wrote:
>>> On 31/12/11 10:23, Nigel Titley wrote:
On 31/12/11 09:50, Chris Travers wrote:
> Ok now we are g
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 09:43 -0500, Chris Travers wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Robert James Clay wrote:
>
>> > ledgersmb/LedgerSMB/Reconciliation/CSV/Formats/
>> >
>> > Does that one need to be installed? Note also that th
Let's go ahead and get something in the tracker on this right away.
Most likely the problem is actually that I might not quite know how
the NAME is supposed to work. Feedback would be helpful there.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:10 AM, herman vierendeels
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to reserve new class in entity_class.
> Namely , myEntity, meaning my own company. So i can stock much more
> info about me than is possible now in defaults table.
>
> Can i do this by adapting sql/Pg-database.sq
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Chris Travers
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As part of my efforts to establish that my LSMB database hasn't been
>>> damaged by the multi-currency
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> Something I've noticed is still present in the v1.3.9 Makefile.PL
> file; the version is set explicitly as '1.2.99', instead of pointing
> somewhere (like LedgerSMB.pm?) to pick up the version. Is that
> intended?
>
Fixed.
Chris Travers
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Håvard Sørli wrote:
>> To block spam and abuse can we change the policy from
>>
>> "Visitors can create accounts and no administrator approval is required."
>>
>> to
>>
>> "Visitors can create accounts but adm
15 matches
Mail list logo
