Ed W writes:
> Simply that a well maintained Git repo is available and clearly
> documented that there is a commitment to remain up to date (eg it's
> implemented in an automatic fashion)
Ed,
There is no automation on my repository:
https://github.com/jfkw/ledgersmb
I am open to finding an aut
Hi
I don't think "moving to a web framework" is the right way to look at
LedgerSMB's direction. This way of framing things presupposes that
LedgerSMB will always be primarily a web app, and I don't think that's
a good idea. We already have users who are up against the limits of
what you can
Hi
So with those thoughts in mind I want to ask two basic questions:
1) For git users, what do we need to do today to make use of git with
LedgerSMB more pleasant?
Simply that a well maintained Git repo is available and clearly
documented that there is a commitment to remain up to date (eg
