Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] 1.2 -> 1.4 data port missing tables & constraints not in DB?

2013-11-19 Thread Chris Travers
Hi; I think I understand what difficulties you are getting at. The jobs table can be ignored. It is there for asynchronous processing of processing jobs, not for job costing. it's a bad name for the table and we should probably change it. Am I right in assuming that you need to be able to trac

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] 1.2 -> 1.4 data port missing tables & constraints not in DB?

2013-11-19 Thread turtle
Sorry this was vague > Should the parts_id's and project id's be ported to the "job" table? I mean the should the old parts.project_id be mapped to job table? -- Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software exp

[Ledger-smb-devel] 1.2 -> 1.4 data port missing tables & constraints not in DB?

2013-11-19 Thread turtle
A few questions today regarding a port of data from a 1.2 system to a 1.4 system. Is there a document that describes how to run and order the manual upgrade scripts? Should the parts_id's and project id's be ported to the "job" table? Ledgersmb/Upgrade_tests.pm requires Unique nonobsolete partnu