Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] any objection to 1.5 depending on Pg 9.2 and above?

2016-02-15 Thread Chris Travers
Merged! On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Chris, > > With 9.1 going EOL in September, RHEL 7 has 9.2 and 9.4 is in Debian Stable > (Jessie) *and* with 1.5 not being out yet, I think we should be safe moving > to 9.2: it's likely to be on any mainstream new install we can

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] any objection to 1.5 depending on Pg 9.2 and above?

2016-02-15 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Chris, With 9.1 going EOL in September, RHEL 7 has 9.2 and 9.4 is in Debian Stable (Jessie) *and* with 1.5 not being out yet, I think we should be safe moving to 9.2: it's likely to be on any mainstream new install we can expect. Regards, Erik. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Chris Trave

[Ledger-smb-devel] any objection to 1.5 depending on Pg 9.2 and above?

2016-02-15 Thread Chris Travers
Hi; I have a pull request that significantly tightens up our stored procedure logic but depends on features that were first introduced in 9.2. This would significantly improve our ability to say for sure that our stored procedures are valid for the versions we release (I found a number of issues