All,
A preliminary version of a Debian package for LedgerSMB v1.4.25 is now
available; this includes a correction to theapache 2.4 related lines in the
installed ledgersmb-httpd-2.4.conf file. Built for Debian 'stable' ("jessie"),
the files are:
ledgersmb_1.4.25+ds-0jessie1_all.deb
ledgersmb_1
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that our database schema management tool is nearly ready, we can upgrade
> existing databases much more easily than before.
>
> However, since changes will be marked in the database as "applied", we need
> some additional pro
Hi;
I am merging our new db update system, replacing the Fixes.sql. This
will also allow for continuous upgrading rather than the migration
between major versions we have done since 1.2. The idea is loosely
based on Sqitch but modified for cases like ours where we are managing
multiple stable br
Hi all,
In the past we've always said we want our tree structure to be compatible
with the requirements for CPAN. With our recent cleanup, it looks like the
next step is really, really close: to me it looks like all we need to do is
move LedgerSMB* from the toplevel directory into a newly created
Hi all,
Now that our database schema management tool is nearly ready, we can
upgrade existing databases much more easily than before.
However, since changes will be marked in the database as "applied", we need
some additional process for new databases. I'm seeing a number of solutions
here;
1. M
Completely forget to mention that a change by Chris is likely to land on
master this week which allows us to manage schema changes better,
eliminating the errors in the database logs that we have now from
Fixes.sql. An important step to improving our user experience!
Regards,
Erik.
On Mon, Feb 2
Hi all,
This is an update for those of you who do not follow the #ledgersmb IRC
channel closely: John Locke basically "completed" our move to Dojo this
weekend: instead of running against an uncompressed, unoptimized Dojo
version, which requires litterally hundreds of requests to build the
initial
Hi,
Now that we have switched to using Dojo's build system (thanks John, for
doing the legwork on it!), we need to decide a few things:
1. Do we require UI developers to submit updated UI/build/ directory
content?
2. Do we start rebuilding the directory content on Travis on every commit
that has
