Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] 1.4.28

2016-05-04 Thread Erik Huelsmann
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > I think filling it in with null in 1.4 is a good idea, as is removing it > in 1.5 > On review, this problem doesn't exist in 1.5. So, it's a 1.4-only fix which I'll treat as such. Thanks for the quick response! Regards, -- Bye, Erik.

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] 1.4.28

2016-05-04 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Michael, 1.4.29 will have a fix for this. If you want to patch your local install in order to be able to proceed your upgrade / accounting, this is the fix you can apply. It won't interfere with a regular 1.4.29 upgrade: https://github.com/ledgersmb/LedgerSMB/pull/1489/commits/8d28270f04c7cb8b9

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] 1.4.28

2016-05-04 Thread Chris Travers
I think filling it in with null in 1.4 is a good idea, as is removing it in 1.5 On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for your report! Based on it, I can conclude that apparently nobody > has been using check printing in 1.4... because the "project_id" c

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] 1.4.28

2016-05-04 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi Michael, Thanks for your report! Based on it, I can conclude that apparently nobody has been using check printing in 1.4... because the "project_id" column has been removed when making the step from 1.3 to 1.4. @Chris, I've searched for the use of the project_id column in: LedgerSMB::Scripts::