Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Sales Invoice

2016-08-10 Thread Chris Travers
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Bob Crandell wrote: > Hi David, > > I'm trying move this thread to the developers. If it works I'll throw > some Timecard ideas at you. > > I am working on the Timecard and I can't get it to work. When I enter > "Labor", a service or "MBB150", a part both valid

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Sales Invoice

2016-08-10 Thread Chris Travers
Hi; Can you please describe your workflow. It sounds like we need to make some fields required for initial entry that are not. Are you entering by date or quantity? Best Wishes, Chris Travers On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Bob Crandell wrote: > Hi David, > > I'm trying move this thread to

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Sales Invoice

2016-08-10 Thread Bob Crandell
Hi David, I'm trying move this thread to the developers. If it works I'll throw some Timecard ideas at you. I am working on the Timecard and I can't get it to work. When I enter "Labor", a service or "MBB150", a part both valid I get: Attribute (qty) is required at constructor LedgerSMB::Time

[Ledger-smb-devel] LedgerSMB v1.4.32-1 uploaded to Debian

2016-08-10 Thread Robert J. Clay
All, The v1.4.32 version of LedgerSMB (1.4.32+ds-1) has been uploaded to Debian and has already transitioned to Ubuntu for their next release ('Yakkety'). Barring any issues, I anticipate that it will transition to Debian Testing ('stretch') by next week, at which point I plan to backport it. O

[Ledger-smb-devel] 1.5.0-rc2 and after

2016-08-10 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi all, In order to be able to release 1.5.0-rc2, there are (at the moment) 3 blocking issues (https://github.com/ledgersmb/LedgerSMB/issues?q=is%3Aopen+ is%3Aissue+milestone%3A1.5-rc2+label%3Ablocking). When those have been resolved, I'm planning to wait 5 days for the dust to settle and possibl