Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Case for using a web framework, eg Mojolicious

2012-09-10 Thread Erik Colson
Chris Travers writes: > First, before I go into this, setting some expectations. > > I don't think "moving to a web framework" is the right way to look at > LedgerSMB's direction. This way of framing things presupposes that > LedgerSMB will always be primarily a web app, and I don't think that's

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Case for using a web framework, eg Mojolicious

2012-09-05 Thread Ed W
Hi I don't think "moving to a web framework" is the right way to look at LedgerSMB's direction. This way of framing things presupposes that LedgerSMB will always be primarily a web app, and I don't think that's a good idea. We already have users who are up against the limits of what you can

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Case for using a web framework, eg Mojolicious

2012-09-03 Thread Chris Travers
First, before I go into this, setting some expectations. I don't think "moving to a web framework" is the right way to look at LedgerSMB's direction. This way of framing things presupposes that LedgerSMB will always be primarily a web app, and I don't think that's a good idea. We already have us

[Ledger-smb-devel] Case for using a web framework, eg Mojolicious

2012-09-03 Thread Ed W
Hi, I have some experience of using the perl web framework Mojolicious and whilst there are a number of very nice web frameworks, I would like to suggest the use of Mojolicious for LSMB. I think you can gain a very good working knowledge of the framework if you watch the first couple of videos: