On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Chris,
>
>
> On 2012-07-14 17:57, Chris Travers wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Chris Travers
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Philip Rhoades
> >> wrote:
> >>> Chris,
> >>>
> >>> ETA?
> >>
> >> I just got the
Chris,
On 2012-07-14 17:57, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Chris Travers
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Philip Rhoades
>> wrote:
>>> Chris,
>>>
>>> ETA?
>>
>> I just got the first web services model completed. I have a number
>> of
>> issues I need to
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
>> Chris,
>>
>> ETA?
>
> I just got the first web services model completed. I have a number of
> issues I need to correct first. Probably in the next 2-3 weeks.
>
BTw, this will be th
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Chris,
>
> ETA?
I just got the first web services model completed. I have a number of
issues I need to correct first. Probably in the next 2-3 weeks.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
---
Chris,
ETA?
Thanks,
Phil.
On 2012-07-12 14:23, Chris Travers wrote:
> Ok, will look at getting a new snapshot out as soon as the bugs in my
> queue are fixed.
>
> Also I am noticing a problem with newer versions of Fedora that a
> specific dependency is missing. I am looking into what to do a
Ok, will look at getting a new snapshot out as soon as the bugs in my
queue are fixed.
Also I am noticing a problem with newer versions of Fedora that a
specific dependency is missing. I am looking into what to do about
that.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
--
Chris,
On 2012-07-11 23:24, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Philip Rhoades
> wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> On 2012-07-11 22:39, Chris Travers wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Philip Rhoades
>>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Chris,
>> >>
>> >> OK, now I have got to the L
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Chris,
>
>
> On 2012-07-11 22:39, Chris Travers wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Philip Rhoades
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Chris,
> >>
> >> OK, now I have got to the LSMB menu - I will have a closer look now
> >> bu
> >> two (minor) th
Chris,
On 2012-07-11 22:39, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Philip Rhoades
> wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> OK, now I have got to the LSMB menu - I will have a closer look now
>> bu
>> two (minor) things:
>>
>> 1. Creating a new DB sometimes fails because of timeout on the
>
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Chris,
>
> OK, now I have got to the LSMB menu - I will have a closer look now bu
> two (minor) things:
>
> 1. Creating a new DB sometimes fails because of timeout on the server
>
We may need to document this.
>
> 2. All the fields need t
Chris,
OK, now I have got to the LSMB menu - I will have a closer look now bu
two (minor) things:
1. Creating a new DB sometimes fails because of timeout on the server
2. All the fields need to be populated when creating the admin user
I will send more feedback later - what sections should be
I just found and corrected another problem.
The path setting in the ledgersmb.conf.default had a : instead of an =.
Unless you fix it, the config file won't load.
Again this is specific to 1.4.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
--
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Sorry about the testing delay - I have continuing family health issues
> which regularly distract me.
>
> I built the current RPM version from SVN, and installed it OK on a
> fresh, virtual Fedora17 i686 machine but I get this in e
Chris,
Sorry about the testing delay - I have continuing family health issues
which regularly distract me.
I built the current RPM version from SVN, and installed it OK on a
fresh, virtual Fedora17 i686 machine but I get this in error_log:
[Tue Jul 10 12:52:05 2012] [error] [client 127.0.0.1]
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> It looks like the previous mail didn't get through because of file size -
> reduced and trying again . .
>
To fix the above issue:
DELETE FROM menu_acl WHERE node_id IN (1, 21);
Those nodes shouldn't have direct acl's attached anyway.
Best
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> It looks like the previous mail didn't get through because of file size -
> reduced and trying again . .
>
>
> Chris,
>
> The RPM installed fine but the screen looks odd - see attached png.
>
That's weird. I am looking into why that happens
It looks like the previous mail didn't get through because of file size
- reduced and trying again . .
Chris,
The RPM installed fine but the screen looks odd - see attached png.
Phil.
On 2012-06-06 12:01, Chris Travers wrote:
Hi all;
I have released 1.4M2-4845. This release is listed as
Hi all;
I have released 1.4M2-4845. This release is listed as M2 because we
now have the contact management system re-engineered as far as it is
likely to go for 1.4. M3 will probably follow soon with
customer/vendor/lead management web services (the handler is done, and
the object classes now m
18 matches
Mail list logo
