Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-18 Thread Luke
On Tue, 17 May 2011, Chris Travers wrote: > For the last few years, LedgerSMB has achieved significant growth. > Some of that growth has come at an organizational cost and for that I > apologize to the community. Now I have to try to help put the > organizational stuff back together. We had the

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-17 Thread Joshua Berkus
Chris, > Many of you may be frustrated at the pace of development of LedgerSMB > and the fact that 1.3 has not yet been released. Development may > appear to have slowed. Public discussions become less frequent... FWIW, this is normal for projects approaching their first Big Release. The answe

[Ledger-smb-devel] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-17 Thread Chris Travers
Hi all; Many of you may be frustrated at the pace of development of LedgerSMB and the fact that 1.3 has not yet been released. Development may appear to have slowed. Public discussions become less frequent... For the last few years, LedgerSMB has achieved significant growth. Some of that growth