Hi all;
LedgerSMB 1.3.6-rc1 has been released with many bugfixes. If you are
affected by any of these bugs you may want to test this release.
The changelog is so long I have broken it down into sections.
Best wishes,
Chris Travers
Changelog for LedgerSMB 1.3.7 (Categorized due to length)
Data
People,
On 2011-11-26 09:46, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:08 AM, David A. Bandel
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 18:11, Chris Travers
>> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>
>>> Ok. So with a server, my primary concern is that upgrading things
>>> is
>>> always a somewhat risky
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:08 AM, David A. Bandel wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 18:11, Chris Travers wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>
>> Ok. So with a server, my primary concern is that upgrading things is
>> always a somewhat risky process. Basically, when you upgrade, you
>> risk breaking things, so
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 18:11, Chris Travers wrote:
[snip]
>
> Ok. So with a server, my primary concern is that upgrading things is
> always a somewhat risky process. Basically, when you upgrade, you
> risk breaking things, so generally speaking you want to have longer
> terms of support and a
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Chris, Darald,
>
>
> On 2011-11-24 00:31, Chris Travers wrote:
>> Hi;
>>
>> Just a few notes to anyone who may be looking for recommendations.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:21 AM, o1bigtenor
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am also not trying to start
Chris, Darald,
On 2011-11-24 00:31, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Just a few notes to anyone who may be looking for recommendations.
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:21 AM, o1bigtenor
> wrote:
>
>> I am also not trying to start any kind of distro war!
>
> Noted.
>>
>> I switched from Fedora for b
Hi;
Just a few notes to anyone who may be looking for recommendations.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:21 AM, o1bigtenor wrote:
> I am also not trying to start any kind of distro war!
Noted.
>
> I switched from Fedora for business use because I got right tired of
> having to update every six months
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> István,
>
>
> On 2011-11-22 22:44, Pongrácz István wrote:
>> Philip,
>>
>> Now it is clear to me your point of view, you are completly right :)
>> It was my misunderstanding your requirement, in your case standard
>> package is the real solu
Chris, Roderick,
On 2011-11-23 12:23, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Roderick A. Anderson
> wrote:
>> Chris Travers wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Philip Rhoades
>>> wrote:
Chris,
RPM?
>>> As soon as the pace of bugfixes slows down eno
István,
On 2011-11-22 22:44, Pongrácz István wrote:
> Philip,
>
> Now it is clear to me your point of view, you are completly right :)
> It was my misunderstanding your requirement, in your case standard
> package is the real solution, correct :)
Yes, I already have stuff that I have to re-inst
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Roderick A. Anderson
wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
>>> Chris,
>>>
>>> RPM?
>>>
>> As soon as the pace of bugfixes slows down enough for me to deal with
>> packaging the Std::Config module from CPAN as an R
Chris Travers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
>> Chris,
>>
>> RPM?
>>
> As soon as the pace of bugfixes slows down enough for me to deal with
> packaging the Std::Config module from CPAN as an RPM.
Is there anything special about the RPM you would generate?
I can
Philip,
Now it is clear to me your point of view, you are completly right :)
It was my misunderstanding your requirement, in your case standard package is
the real solution, correct :)
Cheers,
István
--
All the
Steve,
On 2011-11-22 19:48, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Pongrácz István
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If you would like to get the latest release asap, you should try to
>> use the subversion repository.
>> The fsvs subversion client is easy to use, I recommend it.
>>
>> I
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Pongrácz István
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you would like to get the latest release asap, you should try to use the
> subversion repository.
> The fsvs subversion client is easy to use, I recommend it.
>
> I use it with svn, working well. I can test the fix right after
Hi,
If you would like to get the latest release asap, you should try to use the
subversion repository.
The fsvs subversion client is easy to use, I recommend it.
I use it with svn, working well. I can test the fix right after the commit.
Much quicker to test instead of using prebuilt packages.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Chris,
>
> RPM?
>
As soon as the pace of bugfixes slows down enough for me to deal with
packaging the Std::Config module from CPAN as an RPM.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
-
Chris,
RPM?
Thanks,
Phil.
On 2011-11-22 10:56, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> We have gone ahead and released 1.3.6-rc1. This includes a
> significant
> number of bug fixes including the inability to select a language for
> the invoice when emailing it out, some SQL errors, permissions er
Hi all;
We have gone ahead and released 1.3.6-rc1. This includes a significant
number of bug fixes including the inability to select a language for
the invoice when emailing it out, some SQL errors, permissions errors
and the like. Additionally it includes some demo xelatex templates
(in the dire
19 matches
Mail list logo
