On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 17:26 -0500, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 03:54 -0500, Chris Travers wrote:
> > Let's go ahead and get something in the tracker on this right away.
>
> As initial examples of what I'm talking about, I've added the
> following 'Documentation Requests' t
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 03:54 -0500, Chris Travers wrote:
> Let's go ahead and get something in the tracker on this right away.
As initial examples of what I'm talking about, I've added the
following 'Documentation Requests' type tracker items: 3472011,
3472015, & 3472019. They also include exa
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 03:54 -0500, Chris Travers wrote:
> Let's go ahead and get something in the tracker on this right away.
I'll start working on that.
> Most likely the problem is actually that I might not quite know how
> the NAME is supposed to work. Feedback would be helpful there.
Let's go ahead and get something in the tracker on this right away.
Most likely the problem is actually that I might not quite know how
the NAME is supposed to work. Feedback would be helpful there.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 21:21 -0500, Robert James Clay wrote:
> I've found some 50 Perl source files that have various types
> of issues with the pod NAME entries in the files,
They came to my attention because they ended up causing warnings on
the man pages derived from them because of b
