On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Luke wrote:
> Why first X and not entire thing?
>
> I would definitely like to see the payee name, or at least some of it.
The 1.3 recon screen has a lot of data on it, and I'd be worried about
things getting harder to follow if the screen space is not sufficient
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Chris Travers wrote:
> That might not be a bad idea. Let me think about this and see what
> the best way to do this would be.
>
> The original thinking was to keep this as close to the bank format as
> possible. But maybe an option to display first x characters of payee
> na
Hi, Chris,
I think the best way would be to add a payee column to cr_report_line ,
and modify reconciliation__pending_transactions to load it with either
entity.name (with the joins on eca) or gl.description.
I guess I had already modified the UI to show the payee column. I can
put together a pat
Hi John;
That might not be a bad idea. Let me think about this and see what
the best way to do this would be.
The original thinking was to keep this as close to the bank format as
possible. But maybe an option to display first x characters of payee
name might be a good thing?
Best Wishes,
Chri
Hi,
My bookkeeper is making headway on reconciling in LSMB 1.3, and we've
hit a couple issues.
1. No payee on reconciliation detail
Direct feedback from my bookkeeper, that it can be quite difficult to
match up transactions to statements when there's no payee listed on the
reconciliation detail.
