Hi Luke,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Luke wrote:
>> Note: these were made against a pristine version of the script so they can
>> be applied to the version in sources, not relying on my earlier patches.
>> As a result,
Hi Luke,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Luke wrote:
> Note: these were made against a pristine version of the script so they can
> be applied to the version in sources, not relying on my earlier patches.
> As a result, this first one is the second patch which fixes the "pgslq"
> typo.
>
> To m
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Luke wrote:
> Note: these were made against a pristine version of the script so they can
> be applied to the version in sources, not relying on my earlier patches.
> As a result, this first one is the second patch which fixes the "pgslq"
> typo.
>
> To make them bo
Note: these were made against a pristine version of the script so they can
be applied to the version in sources, not relying on my earlier patches.
As a result, this first one is the second patch which fixes the "pgslq"
typo.
To make them both applicable, I have revised the first one (which fix
