Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] future coding standards for stored procedure names

2011-11-25 Thread Chris Travers
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:26 AM, herman vierendeels wrote: > Hi Chris, > > This is a bit new to me. > Could you tell a little more about the function of a separator in a > stored_procedure name? > Is this separator meant to be interpreted in pre-db code or in the db itself? > > Object oriented guy

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] future coding standards for stored procedure names

2011-11-25 Thread herman vierendeels
Hi Chris, This is a bit new to me. Could you tell a little more about the function of a separator in a stored_procedure name? Is this separator meant to be interpreted in pre-db code or in the db itself? Object oriented guys would prefer object->method syntax. Thanks, Herman 2011/11/25 Chris

[Ledger-smb-devel] future coding standards for stored procedure names

2011-11-24 Thread Chris Travers
Hi; I am thinking one area we probably want to firm up our coding standards is in the area of stored procedure names. There are two fundamental issues I see with our current approach in 1.3. The first is that the double underscore approach really doesn't work well except in the case of roles whe