On 22/08/2013 13:13, Chris Travers wrote:
> I'm seriously thinking of leaping direct from 1.2 to 1.4 without the
>
> distraction of 1.3 in the middle. Is this likely to be possible? My
> staff have been testing 1.3 intermittantly and don't think the
> benefits
> outweigh the downsid
On 22.08.2013 15:36, Chris Travers wrote
>
> What's the path from SQL-Ledger 2.8.latest to LSMB 1.4? I still haven't
> managed to get off SL.
>
>
> I have an upgrade script for upgrading SQL-Ledger 2.8 to LedgerSMB 1.4.
> I haven't fully tested it (last successful upgrade was to 1.3). It
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Leho Kraav wrote:
> On 22.08.2013 15:13, Chris Travers wrote:>
> >
> > 1.2 to 1.4 is a supported upgrade path. It will likely be the last
> > supported upgrade path from 1.2.
> >
>
> What's the path from SQL-Ledger 2.8.latest to LSMB 1.4? I still haven't
> manage
On 22.08.2013 15:13, Chris Travers wrote:>
>
> 1.2 to 1.4 is a supported upgrade path. It will likely be the last
> supported upgrade path from 1.2.
>
What's the path from SQL-Ledger 2.8.latest to LSMB 1.4? I still haven't
managed to get off SL.
-
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Nigel Titley wrote:
> On 22/08/2013 06:18, Chris Travers wrote:
> > Hi everyone;
> >
> > At this point both Efficito and 2ndQuadrant SE Asia are using 1.4 for
> > internal operations. I feel comfortable with this since as problems
> > come up I can fix them.
> >
On 22/08/2013 06:18, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi everyone;
>
> At this point both Efficito and 2ndQuadrant SE Asia are using 1.4 for
> internal operations. I feel comfortable with this since as problems
> come up I can fix them.
>
> I have noticed that a lot of things work very well, and a few thing
Hi everyone;
At this point both Efficito and 2ndQuadrant SE Asia are using 1.4 for
internal operations. I feel comfortable with this since as problems come
up I can fix them.
I have noticed that a lot of things work very well, and a few things do
not. The contact screen needs some work, and the
