On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> And with success: Even though new bugs were found and logged, we're
> currently down to 0 (zero!) bugs registered in the bug-tracker (and
> none located elsewhere). The pending patches queue contains only 2
> patches and all pending patches
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, David A. Bandel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 20:04, Luke wrote:
>> Using the prepare script from revision 3248, I found some oddities.
>>
>> First, in the usage, the usage line implies that all options are optional
>> (scriptname [option1 .. optionN]).
>> However, the com
While installing 1.3, I'm getting:
ERROR: role "lsmb_testco__ar_voucher_all" does not exist
In relation to sql/modules/Roles.sql.
I don't know why, but these create role statements are commented out. I
have to imagine that there's a reason for this, but it is prompting an
error.
--CREATE RO
During the import of
/usr/share/postgresql/8.3/contrib/pg_trgm.sql
There is this:
NOTICE: type "gtrgm" is not yet defined
DETAIL: Creating a shell type definition.
CREATE FUNCTION
NOTICE: argument type gtrgm is only a shell
Is this something to be concerned about? I'm guessing not, as it's
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 20:04, Luke wrote:
> Using the prepare script from revision 3248, I found some oddities.
>
> First, in the usage, the usage line implies that all options are optional
> (scriptname [option1 .. optionN]).
> However, the company option is required.
Hmm. I saw a * suggesting
Using the prepare script from revision 3248, I found some oddities.
First, in the usage, the usage line implies that all options are optional
(scriptname [option1 .. optionN]).
However, the company option is required.
In addition, the --pgsql-contrib option is supposed to be optional,
apparentl
