[Ledger-smb-devel] Changing how LedgerSMB is run and it's installation is secured

2016-03-24 Thread David G
Hi All, There has been some discussion on IRC today regarding options for running LedgerSMB (httpd) and how/what System User to run as. The long and the short of it is the following proposal. If you have any thoughts or suggestions could you please comment b

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Changing how LedgerSMB is run and it's installation is secured

2016-03-24 Thread Chris Travers
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:51 AM, David G wrote: > Hi All, > > There has been some discussion on IRC today regarding options for running > LedgerSMB (httpd) and how/what System User to run as. > > The long and the short of it is the following proposal. > If you have any thoughts or suggestions cou

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Changing how LedgerSMB is run and it's installation is secured

2016-03-24 Thread David G
Hi Chris On 24/03/16 18:08, Chris Travers wrote: On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:51 AM, David G wrote: Hi All, There has been some discussion

[Ledger-smb-devel] Preliminary Debian package for LedgerSMB v1.4.26

2016-03-24 Thread Robert James Clay
All, A preliminary version of a Debian package for LedgerSMB v1.4.26 is now available. Built for Debian 'stable' ("jessie"), the files are available with a sources.list entry like this (As usual, the file checksums and md5sums are listed in the *dsc file, which is gpg signed by me.): deb http

[Ledger-smb-devel] Preliminary Ubuntu packages for LedgerSMB v1.4.26

2016-03-24 Thread Robert James Clay
All, A preliminary version of Ubuntu packages for LedgerSMB v1.4.26 were made available yesterday at our Launchpad PPA[1] and are available using the following sources.list entry: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ledgersmb/main/ubuntu VERSION main Where in this case, "VERSION" is 'trusty' or 'wil

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Changing how LedgerSMB is run and it's installation is secured

2016-03-24 Thread Chris Travers
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:42 PM, David G wrote: > Hi Chris > > On 24/03/16 18:08, Chris Travers wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:51 AM, David G wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> There has been some discussion on IRC today regarding options for running >> LedgerSMB (httpd) and how/what System Use

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Changing how LedgerSMB is run and it's installation is secured

2016-03-24 Thread Nick Prater
> At the moment running under Apache prevents print to pdf/screen (it > fails with errors), while running under starman works Is this something different with 1.5? I have two 1.4.26 installations using apache. One running as old-school cgi, the other using apache as a proxy in front of Starman,

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Changing how LedgerSMB is run and it's installation is secured

2016-03-24 Thread Chris Travers
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Chris Travers wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Nick Prater wrote: > >> > At the moment running under Apache prevents print to pdf/screen (it >> > fails with errors), while running under starman works >> >> Is this something different with 1.5? >> >>

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Changing how LedgerSMB is run and it's installation is secured

2016-03-24 Thread Chris Travers
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Nick Prater wrote: > > At the moment running under Apache prevents print to pdf/screen (it > > fails with errors), while running under starman works > > Is this something different with 1.5? > > I have two 1.4.26 installations using apache. One running as old-scho

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Changing how LedgerSMB is run and it's installation is secured

2016-03-24 Thread Erik Huelsmann
Hi, > At the moment running under Apache prevents print to pdf/screen (it >>> > fails with errors), while running under starman works >>> >>> Is this something different with 1.5? >>> >>> I have two 1.4.26 installations using apache. One running as old-school >>> cgi, the other using apache as a p