On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Stroller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9 Jun 2008, at 17:50, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> The thread is at:
>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?
>> thread_name=1314.76.95.44.123.1212947229.squirrel%
>> 40www.clustersolutions.net&forum_name=sql-ledger-us
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Roderick A. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Munroe Sollog wrote:
>> We are currently using sql-ledger, and are not happy with their
>> invoicing capability. We are a service based company that builds
>> invoices over a month then sends them out at the end of
On 9 Jun 2008, at 17:50, Chris Travers wrote:
> The thread is at:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?
> thread_name=1314.76.95.44.123.1212947229.squirrel%
> 40www.clustersolutions.net&forum_name=sql-ledger-users
"122 messages have been excluded from this view by a project
adminis
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Ed W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
>
>
> I don't see what the big deal is to use the button element as the primary
> choice and add some javascript as fallback? This gives you IE6/7 from the
> javascript and everyone else without it?
Ok, I hav
Chris Travers wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:44 PM, ERACC Subscriptions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 11 June 2008
Luke wrote:
[...]
All of this said, I am fond of the "Install FireFox: it is the client for
the accounting app" way of handling this, especially if the Prism i
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:44 PM, ERACC Subscriptions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 June 2008
> Luke wrote:
>
> [...]
>> All of this said, I am fond of the "Install FireFox: it is the client for
>> the accounting app" way of handling this, especially if the Prism idea
>> gains ground.
On Wednesday 11 June 2008
Luke wrote:
[...]
> All of this said, I am fond of the "Install FireFox: it is the client for
> the accounting app" way of handling this, especially if the Prism idea
> gains ground.
This is the approach I use when recommending LSMB. So far all the small
business owners
Munroe Sollog wrote:
> We are currently using sql-ledger, and are not happy with their
> invoicing capability. We are a service based company that builds
> invoices over a month then sends them out at the end of the month.
>
> I am wondering if the invoicing system of ledger-smb can handle or pla
We are currently using sql-ledger, and are not happy with their
invoicing capability. We are a service based company that builds
invoices over a month then sends them out at the end of the month.
I am wondering if the invoicing system of ledger-smb can handle or plan
to handle any of the followin
